Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168620›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

scMD facilitates cell type deconvolution using single-cell DNA methylation references.

Manqi Cai, Jingtian Zhou, Chris McKennan, Jiebiao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
29.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manqi CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jingtian ZhouGenomic Analysis Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Chris McKennanDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jiebiao WangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. jbwang@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3828-4400
University of Pittsburgh · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · US

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
SUPPLEMENT TO RUSH ALZHEIMERS DISEASE CENTER COREP30AG010161 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 1991 to 2020
$49.1M
RISK FACTORS, PATHOLOGY, AND CLINICAL EXPRESSIONS OF ADR01AG015819 · NIA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN · 1998 to 2024
$21.4M
Multi-omic network-directed proteoform discovery, dissection and functional validation to prioritize novel AD therapeutic targetsU01AG061356 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN, DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 2018 to 2022
$13.7M
Pathway discovery, validation and compound identification for Alzheimer's disease - SupplementU01AG046152 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BENNETT, DAVID ALAN, DE JAGER, PHILIP L · 2013 to 2017
$13.6M
Methods for single-cell CRISPR screens and multiomic data: constructing powerful well-calibrated tests, circumventing unmeasured confounding, and accounting for denoising and imputationR01MH123184 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI KATHRYN M ROEDER · 2020 to 2026
$3.8M
Statistical methods for population-level cell-type-specific analyses of tissue omics data for Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG080590 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Christopher McKennan, Jiebiao Wang · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Integration of GTEx and HuBMAP data to gain population-level cell-type-specific insightsR03OD034501 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WANG, JIEBIAO, YAN, QI · 2022 to 2022
$315k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010161NIA NIH HHS R01 AG015819NIA NIH HHS R01 AG080590NIA NIH HHS U01 AG046152NIA NIH HHS U01 AG061356NIH HHS R03 OD034501NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of single-cell RNA-sequencing data has led to the widespread use of cellular deconvolution, aiding the extraction of cell-type-specific information from extensive bulk data. However, those advances have been mostly limited to transcriptomic data. With recent developments in single-cell DNA methylation (scDNAm), there are emerging opportunities for deconvolving bulk DNAm data, particularly for solid tissues like brain that lack cell-type references. Due to technical limitations, current scDNAm sequences represent a small proportion of the whole genome for each single cell, and those detected regions differ across cells. This makes scDNAm data ultra-high dimensional and ultra-sparse. To deal with these challenges, we introduce scMD (single cell Methylation Deconvolution), a cellular deconvolution framework to reliably estimate cell type fractions from tissue-level DNAm data. To analyze large-scale complex scDNAm data, scMD employs a statistical approach to aggregate scDNAm data at the cell cluster level, identify cell-type marker DNAm sites, and create precise cell-type signature matrixes that surpass state-of-the-art sorted-cell or RNA-derived references. Through thorough benchmarking in several datasets, we demonstrate scMD's superior performance in estimating cellular fractions from bulk DNAm data. With scMD-estimated cellular fractions, we identify cell type fractions and cell type-specific differentially methylated cytosines associated with Alzheimer's disease.

Indexed as

BrainDNA MethylationGene Expression ProfilingGenomeRNARNA

Identifiers

PMID38168620
PMCPMC10762261
OpenAlexW4390500109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.