Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168532›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Patient-related factors influencing the effectiveness and safety of Janus Kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a real-world study.

Cristina Martinez-Molina, Ignasi Gich, Cesar Diaz-Torné, Hye S Park, Anna Feliu, Silvia Vidal, Hèctor Corominas

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Rheumatoid Arthritis: Biomarkers and the Latest Breakthroughs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The N-of-1 Trials and where to use them in Rheumatology.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina Martinez-MolinaDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5079-613X
Ignasi GichCIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3975-6588
Cesar Diaz-TornéDepartment of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6275-7699
Hye S ParkDepartment of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4972-9527
Anna FeliuDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2074-2231
Silvia VidalDepartment of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3909-6682
Hèctor CorominasDepartment of Rheumatology and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain. hcorominas@santpau.cat.ORCID 0000-0002-7738-6787
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In real-world scenarios, Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors are often offered to "difficult-to-treat" rheumatoid arthritis patients, quite different from those included in randomized controlled trials. Our study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-related factors on the effectiveness and safety of JAK inhibitors in real-world clinical practice. This observational retrospective study involved rheumatoid arthritis patients who received treatment with either tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib. At 12 months of treatment, reasons for and rates of JAK inhibitor treatment discontinuation were examined. Treatment retentions were analyzed through Cox proportional hazard regression models and Kaplan-Meier estimates. Patient-related factors that could influence treatment retention were evaluated for the discontinuation reasons of lack of effectiveness and adverse events. At 12 months of treatment, discontinuation rates for 189 JAK inhibitor treatments were: lack of effectiveness (24.3%), adverse events (20.6%), and other reasons (3.7%). The remaining 51.4% represents the treatment continuation rate. No patient-related factors evaluated had an influence on treatment discontinuation due to lack of effectiveness. Ae significantly increased the risk of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (p = 0.030). In terms of age, at 12 month of treatment, discontinuation rates due to adverse events were: < 65 years, 14.4% vs. 65 years or older, 26.3% (p = 0.019). Rheumatoid arthritis patients aged 65 years or older showed an increased risk of JAK inhibitor treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Factors not related to treatment discontinuation were: sex, rheumatoid arthritis disease duration, rheumatoid arthritis disease activity, seropositivity for rheumatoid factor, seropositivity for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptides, number of prior biologic treatments, number of prior JAK inhibitor treatments, concomitant use of glucocorticoids, and concomitant use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidJanus Kinase InhibitorsChild, PreschoolHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntirheumatic AgentsJanus Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38168532
PMCPMC10761698
OpenAlexW4390509239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.