Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168495›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Animal movement on the hoof and on the cart and its implications for understanding exchange within the Indus Civilisation.

C A Petrie, E Lightfoot, P J Jones, J R Walker, B T Valentine, J Krigbaum, P le Roux, P P Joglekar, V Shinde, R N Singh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

C A PetrieDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. cap59@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2926-7230
E LightfootDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0823-4720
P J JonesMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-6711
J R WalkerDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5244-5309
B T ValentineDepartment of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9567-7231
J KrigbaumDepartment of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-7061
P le RouxDepartment of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5930-4995
P P JoglekarDepartment of Archaeology, Deccan College, Pune, India.
V ShindeDepartment of Archaeology, Deccan College, Pune, India.
R N SinghDepartment of AIHC and Archaeology, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1102-4839
T C O'ConnellDepartment of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4744-0332

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 648609UKRI Global Challenges Research Fund BB/P027970/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Movement of resources was essential to the survival and success of early complex societies. The sources and destinations of goods and the means of transportation - be it by boats, carts and/or foot - can often be inferred, but the logistics of these movements are inherently more difficult to ascertain. Here, we use strontium isotopic analysis to test hypotheses about the role of animal and animal-powered transport in medium and long-distance movement and exchange, using the Indus Civilization as a case study. Across the wide geographical spread of the Indus Civilisation, there is strong evidence for long-distance exchange of raw materials and finished objects and this process is presumed to involve boats and animal-driven transport, although there is little evidence as to the relative importance of each mode of movement. Strontium isotopic analysis of animal remains from four sites analysed for this study combined with results from nine other sites indicates limited long-distance animal movement between different geological zones within the Indus Civilisation. These findings suggest that individual animals primarily moved short- or medium-distances, though there are several significant exceptions seen in some pigs and cattle found at two large urban sites. We infer that long-distance transport of goods, be it raw materials, finished objects, other goods, or the animals themselves, could have occurred through the use of boats and waterways, by traction animals moving over long distances that did not end up in the archaeological record, and/or by different animals participating in many short to medium-distance movements.

Indexed as

Hoof and ClawAnimalsArchaeologyCattleCivilizationMovementStrontium IsotopesSwineTransportationStrontium Isotopes

Identifiers

PMID38168495
PMCPMC10762248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.