Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168308›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Predicting neutralization susceptibility to combination HIV-1 monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibody regimens.

Brian D Williamson, Liana Wu, Yunda Huang, Aaron Hudson, Peter B Gilbert

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Brian D WilliamsonBiostatistics Division, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7024-548X
Liana WuVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-6159-4895
Yunda HuangVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aaron HudsonVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Peter B GilbertVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZA

Funding

SDMC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068635 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Peter B. Gilbert, Yunda Huang · 2011 to 2026
$385.9M
SeattleStatSummer for Biomedical Data Science Research TrainingR25LM014210 · NLM · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Jeanne Ting Chowning, MEGAN OTHUS · 2022 to 2026
$666k
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068635NLM NIH HHS R25 LM014210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combination monoclonal broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) are currently being developed for preventing HIV-1 infection. Recent work has focused on predicting in vitro neutralization potency of both individual bnAbs and combination regimens against HIV-1 pseudoviruses using Env sequence features. To predict in vitro combination regimen neutralization potency against a given HIV-1 pseudovirus, previous approaches have applied mathematical models to combine individual-bnAb neutralization and have predicted this combined neutralization value; we call this the combine-then-predict (CP) approach. However, prediction performance for some individual bnAbs has exceeded that for the combination, leading to another possibility: combining the individual-bnAb predicted values and using these to predict combination regimen neutralization; we call this the predict-then-combine (PC) approach. We explore both approaches in both simulated data and data from the Los Alamos National Laboratory's Compile, Neutralize, and Tally NAb Panels repository. The CP approach is superior to the PC approach when the neutralization outcome of interest is binary (e.g., neutralization susceptibility, defined as inhibitory concentration < 1 μg/mL. For continuous outcomes, the CP approach performs at least as well as the PC approach, and is superior to the PC approach when the individual-bnAb prediction algorithms have poor performance. This knowledge may be used when building prediction models for novel antibody combinations in the absence of in vitro neutralization data for the antibody combination; this, in turn, will aid in the evaluation and down-selection of these antibody combinations into prevention efficacy trials.

Indexed as

Broadly neutralizing antibodiesCATNAPcombination regimensHIV-1 Env amino acid sequencesHIV-1 prevention efficacy trials

Identifiers

PMID38168308
PMCPMC10760080
OpenAlexW4389721121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.