ArticleResearch square2023
Quantification of the flexural rigidity of endovascular surgical devices using three-point bending tests.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endovascular surgical procedures require the navigation of catheters and wires through the vasculature to reach distal target sites. Quantitative frameworks for device selection hold the potential to improve the tracking of endovascular devices through vascular anatomy by personalizing the device flexural rigidity to an individual's anatomy. However, data are lacking to facilitate this technology, in part because typical endovascular devices have intricate spatial variations in mechanical properties that are challenging and tedious to quantify repeatably. We therefore developed a three-point bend test methodology using a custom rig and applied it to measure lengthwise flexural rigidity profiles of endovascular devices that are used to target the cerebral vasculature. The methodology demonstrated high repeatability and was able to characterize transition zones. We applied the methodology to generate the first comprehensive, quantitative library of device flexural rigidities, spanning guidewires, intermediate guides, and long sheaths. We observed that these three classes of device have properties that fall into distinct ranges. Additional plots examining relationships between flexural rigidity, device diameter, and length revealed application-specific trends in flexural properties. This methodology and the data allow for standardized characterization and comparisons to aid device selection, and have the potential to both enhance surgical planning and inform future innovation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.