ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Database size positively correlates with the loss of species-level taxonomic resolution for the 16S rRNA and other prokaryotic marker genes.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades, the 16S rRNA gene has been used to taxonomically classify prokaryotic species and to taxonomically profile microbial communities. The 16S rRNA gene has been criticized for being too conserved to differentiate between distinct species. We argue that the inability to differentiate between species is not a unique feature of the 16S rRNA gene. Rather, we observe the gradual loss of species-level resolution for other marker genes as the number of gene sequences increases in reference databases. We demonstrate this effect through the analysis of three commonly used databases of nearly-universal prokaryotic marker genes: the SILVA 16S rRNA gene database, the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB), and a set of 40 taxonomically-informative single-copy genes. Our results reflect a more fundamental property of the taxonomies themselves and have broad implications for bioinformatic analyses beyond taxonomic classification. Effective solutions for fine-level taxonomic classification require a more precise, and operationally-relevant, definition of the taxonomic labels being sought, and the use of combinations of genomic markers in the classification process. Importance: The use of reference databases for assigning taxonomic labels to genomic and metagenomic sequences is a fundamental bioinformatic task in the characterization of microbial communities. The increasing accessibility of high throughput sequencing has led to a rapid increase in the size and number of sequences in databases. This has been beneficial for improving our understanding of the global microbial genetic diversity. However, there is evidence that as the microbial diversity is more densely sampled, increasingly longer genomic segments are needed to differentiate between distinct species. The scientific community needs to be aware of this issue and needs to develop methods that better account for it when assigning taxonomic labels to metagenomic sequences from microbial communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.