Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168203›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2023

LLM Instruction-Example Adaptive Prompting (LEAP) Framework for Clinical Relation Extraction.

Huixue Zhou, Mingchen Li, Yongkang Xiao, Han Yang, Rui Zhang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huixue ZhouInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Mingchen LiDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Yongkang XiaoInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Han YangInstitute for Health Informatics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Rui ZhangDivision of Computational Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8258-3585

Funding

Detecting synergistic effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for AD/ADRDR01AG078154 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HUA XU, RUI ZHANG · 2022 to 2026
$4.2M
A Translational Informatics Framework to Mine Efficacy and Safety of Dietary SupplementsR01AT009457 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI RUI ZHANG · 2017 to 2026
$4.1M
SCH: A New Computational Framework for Learning from Imbalanced Biomedical DataR01CA287413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUI, YING, SUN, JU · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT009457NCI NIH HHS R01 CA287413NIA NIH HHS R01 AG078154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the demonstration in Large Language Models (LLMs) for clinical relation extraction. We focus on examining two types of adaptive demonstration: instruction adaptive prompting, and example adaptive prompting to understand their impacts and effectiveness. Materials and Methods: The study unfolds in two stages. Initially, we explored a range of demonstration components vital to LLMs' clinical data extraction, such as task descriptions and examples, and tested their combinations. Subsequently, we introduced the Instruction-Example Adaptive Prompting (LEAP) Framework, a system that integrates two types of adaptive prompts: one preceding instruction and another before examples. This framework is designed to systematically explore both adaptive task description and adaptive examples within the demonstration. We evaluated LEAP framework's performance on the DDI and BC5CDR chemical interaction datasets, applying it across LLMs such as Llama2-7b, Llama2-13b, and MedLLaMA_13B. Results: The study revealed that Conclusion: The LEAP framework presents a promising avenue for refining LLM training strategies, steering away from extensive finetuning towards more contextually rich and dynamic prompting methodologies.

Indexed as

Clinical Relation ExtractionInstruction-Example Adaptive PromptingInstruction TuningLarge Language Model

Identifiers

PMID38168203
PMCPMC10760264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.