Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168135›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Association with menopausal hormone therapy and asymptomatic gallstones in US women in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Study.

Sarah S Jackson, Barry I Graubard, Chiara Gabbi, Jill Koshiol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah S JacksonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20879, USA. sarah.jackson@nih.gov.
Barry I GraubardDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20879, USA.
Chiara GabbiDepartment of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jill KoshiolDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20879, USA.

Funding

Etiology of Biliary Tract CancerZIACP010218 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI KOSHIOL, JILL · 2011 to 2025
$30.4M
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute Intramural Research Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

15% of US adults have gallstones, most of which are clinically "silent". Several studies show that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) increases symptomatic gallstones and cholecystectomy risk. MHT use may be contraindicated in women with gallstones and population studies may be biased by "confounding by contraindication" while the true association between MHT and gallstones remains underestimated. We sought to examine whether MHT use was associated with asymptomatic gallstones using instrumental variable (IV) analysis to account for confounding by contraindication. We used 2018 postmenopausal women from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to estimate associations of MHT use with asymptomatic gallstones. A traditional logistic regression analysis was compared to instrumental variable (IV) analysis to account for confounding by contraindication. 12% of women with asymptomatic gallstones and 25% of women without gallstones were current MHT users (P < 0.001). The traditional analysis suggested a decreased odds of asymptomatic gallstones in current versus never users (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37, 0.89), but increased odds (OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.44, 5.16) in the IV analysis. The traditional analysis consistently underestimated the odds of asymptomatic gallstones with MHT use compared to the IV analysis. Accounting for confounding by contraindication, we found a suggestive, though imprecise, positive association between MHT use and asymptomatic gallstones among postmenopausal women. Failure to consider contraindication can produce incorrect results.

Indexed as

GallstonesAdultEstrogen Replacement TherapyFemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMenopauseNutrition SurveysSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38168135
PMCPMC10761940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.