Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168094›Full record

ArticleCNS neuroscience & therapeutics2024

Vof16-miR-185-5p-GAP43 network improves the outcomes following spinal cord injury via enhancing self-repair and promoting axonal growth.

Yue Hu, Yi-Fei Sun, Hao Yuan, Jia Liu, Li Chen, Dong-Hui Liu, Yang Xu, Xin-Fu Zhou, Li Ding, Ze-Tao Zhang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CNS neuroscience & therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cryptic Splicing of GAP43 mRNA is a Novel Hallmark of TDP-43-Associated ALS and AD.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. NcRNAs: a potential treatment for spinal cord injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. NeuroAiDBiomedicines · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yue HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yi-Fei SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao YuanLaboratory Zoology Department, Institute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Jia LiuLaboratory Zoology Department, Institute of Neuroscience, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5678-7437
Li ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Dong-Hui LiuClinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Yang XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xin-Fu ZhouClinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Li DingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ze-Tao ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Liu-Lin XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1623-5969
Lu-Lu XueState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ting-Hua WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, Translational Neuroscience Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2012-8936
Sichuan University · CNKunming Institute of Zoology · CNUniversity of South Australia · AUZunyi Medical University · CN

Funding

Collaborative Innovation Center of Chinese Ministry of Education 2020-39Guizhou Province Distinguished Young Scientific and Technological Talent Program YQK[2023]040Guizhou Provincial Higher Education Science and Technological Innovation Team [2023]072National Natural Science Foundation Regional Fund of China 82060243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSelf-repair of spinal cord injury (SCI) has been found in humans and experimental animals with partial recovery of neurological functions. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying the spontaneous locomotion recovery after SCI are elusive.

aimsThis study was aimed at evaluating the pathological changes in injured spinal cord and exploring the possible mechanism related to the spontaneous recovery.

resultsImmunofluorescence staining was performed to detect GAP43 expression in lesion site after spinal cord transection (SCT) in rats. Then RNA sequencing and gene ontology (GO) analysis were employed to predict lncRNA that correlates with GAP43. LncRNA smart-silencing was applied to verify the function of lncRNA vof16 in vitro, and knockout rats were used to evaluate its role in neurobehavioral functions after SCT. MicroRNA sequencing, target scan, and RNA22 prediction were performed to further explore the underlying regulatory mechanisms, and miR-185-5p stands out. A miR-185-5p site-regulated relationship with GAP43 and vof16 was determined by luciferase activity analysis. GAP43-silencing, miR-185-5p-mimic/inhibitor, and miR-185-5p knockout rats were also applied to elucidate their effects on spinal cord neurite growth and neurobehavioral function after SCT. We found that a time-dependent increase of GAP43 corresponded with the limited neurological recovery in rats with SCT. CRNA chip and GO analysis revealed lncRNA vof16 was the most functional in targeting GAP43 in SCT rats. Additionally, silencing vof16 suppressed neurite growth and attenuated the motor dysfunction in SCT rats. Luciferase reporter assay showed that miR-185-5p competitively bound the same regulatory region of vof16 and GAP43.

conclusionsOur data indicated miR-185-5p could be a detrimental factor in SCT, and vof16 may function as a ceRNA by competitively binding miR-185-5p to modulate GAP43 in the process of self-recovery after SCT. Our study revealed a novel vof16-miR-185-5p-GAP43 regulatory network in neurological self-repair after SCT and may underlie the potential treatment target for SCI.

Indexed as

MicroRNAsRNA, Long NoncodingSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsGAP-43 ProteinLuciferasesRatsSpinal CordGAP-43 ProteinLuciferasesMicroRNAsMIRN185 microRNA, ratRNA, Long Noncodingvof-16 long non-coding RNA, ratGAP43lncRNA volf16miR‐185‐5pneurite growthself‐repairspinal cord transection

Identifiers

PMID38168094
PMCPMC11017428
OpenAlexW4390541298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.