Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38167867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Association between metabolites in tryptophan-kynurenine pathway and inflammatory bowel disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization.

Fangqian Yu, Yutong Du, Cong Li, Haiyan Zhang, Weiming Lai, Sheng Li, Zhenhao Ye, Wenbin Fu, Shumin Li, Xiang-Guang Li and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Tracing NADCell reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Tracing NADResearch square · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fangqian YuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yutong DuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Cong LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Haiyan ZhangThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Weiming LaiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Sheng LiThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Zhenhao YeThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Wenbin FuThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Shumin LiLiuzhou Workers' Hospital, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou, 545000, China.
Xiang-Guang LiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China. xgli@gdut.edu.cn.
Ding LuoThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510120, China. doctorluoding@163.com.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNGuangdong Pharmaceutical University · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Fund 2022A1515010430Guangdong Provincial Special Project for the High-Quality Development, Inheritance, Innovation, and Enhancement of Traditional Chinese Medicine [2022]102Guangxi Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 2020GXNSFBA159046the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82074522the R&D Program of Guangdong Province Drug Administration 2021YDZ06the Research Fund for Zhaoyang Talents of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine No. ZY2022KY08the Scientific Research Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine Bureau of Guangdong Province 20221159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous observational studies have suggested an association between tryptophan (TRP)-kynurenine (KYN) pathway and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, whether there is a causal relationship among them remains unclear. Therefore, a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was conducted to explore the potential causal effects of crucial metabolites in TRP-KYN pathway on IBD and its subtypes. Using summary data from genome-wide association studies, a two-sample MR was employed to evaluate the genetic associations between TRP and KYN as exposures and IBD as an outcome. The inverse variance weighted method was used as the primary MR analysis, with MR-Egger, weighted mode, simple mode, and weighted median methods as complementary analyses. The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined for TRP-IBD (OR 0.739, 95% CI [0.697; 0.783]), TRP-UC (OR 0.875, 95% CI [0.814; 0.942]), TRP-CD (OR 0.685, 95% CI [0.613; 0.765]), KYN-IBD (OR 4.406, 95% CI [2.247; 8.641]), KYN-UC (OR 2.578, 95% CI [1.368; 4.858], and KYN-CD (OR 13.516, 95% CI [4.919; 37.134]). Collectively, the MR analysis demonstrated a significant protective association between TRP and IBD, whereas KYN was identified as a risk factor for IBD.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesKynurenineGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMendelian Randomization AnalysisTryptophanKynurenineTryptophan

Identifiers

PMID38167867
PMCPMC10761717
OpenAlexW4390499069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.