Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38167733›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Gene regulation and speciation in a migratory divide between songbirds.

Matthew I M Louder, Hannah Justen, Abigail A Kimmitt, Koedi S Lawley, Leslie M Turner, J David Dickman, Kira E Delmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epigenetic signatures of migratory orientation in a songbird hybrid zone.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Long-interval neurons are selective for slower pulse rates in chorus frogs that are sympatric versus allopatric with congeneric heterospecifics.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew I M LouderBiology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Hannah JustenBiology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Abigail A KimmittBiology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Koedi S LawleyDepartment of Veterinary Integrative Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Leslie M TurnerMilner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology & Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5105-3546
J David DickmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Kira E DelmoreBiology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. kdelmore@bio.tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4108-9729

Funding

Gaze recovery during vestibular regenerationR01DC018746 · NIDCD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DICKMAN, J DAVID · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
National Science Foundation IOS-2143004NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018746
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral variation abounds in nature. This variation is important for adaptation and speciation, but its molecular basis remains elusive. Here, we use a hybrid zone between two subspecies of songbirds that differ in migration - an ecologically important and taxonomically widespread behavior---to gain insight into this topic. We measure gene expression in five brain regions. Differential expression between migratory states was dominated by circadian genes in all brain regions. The remaining patterns were largely brain-region specific. For example, expression differences between the subspecies that interact with migratory state likely help maintain reproductive isolation in this system and were documented in only three brain regions. Contrary to existing work on regulatory mechanisms underlying species-specific traits, two lines of evidence suggest that trans- (vs. cis) regulatory changes underlie these patterns - no evidence for allele-specific expression in hybrids and minimal associations between genomic differentiation and expression differences. Additional work with hybrids shows expression levels were often distinct (transgressive) from parental forms. Behavioral contrasts and functional enrichment analyses allowed us to connect these patterns to mitonuclear incompatibilities and compensatory responses to stress that could exacerbate selection on hybrids and contribute to speciation.

Indexed as

SongbirdsAnimalsGene Expression RegulationGenetic SpeciationGenomeGenomicsHybridization, GeneticReproductive Isolation

Identifiers

PMID38167733
PMCPMC10761872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.