Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38167664›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Programmable high-dimensional Hamiltonian in a photonic waveguide array.

Yang Yang, Robert J Chapman, Ben Haylock, Francesco Lenzini, Yogesh N Joglekar, Mirko Lobino, Alberto Peruzzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang YangQuantum Photonics Laboratory and Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3950-9942
Robert J ChapmanQuantum Photonics Laboratory and Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-8483
Ben HaylockCentre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (Australian Research Council), Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Francesco LenziniCentre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (Australian Research Council), Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Yogesh N JoglekarDepartment of Physics, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, USA. yojoglek@iupui.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-1436
Mirko LobinoCentre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology (Australian Research Council), Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia.
Alberto PeruzzoQuantum Photonics Laboratory and Centre for Quantum Computation and Communication Technology, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. alberto.peruzzo@rmit.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7953-3875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waveguide lattices offer a compact and stable platform for a range of applications, including quantum walks, condensed matter system simulation, and classical and quantum information processing. However, to date, waveguide lattice devices have been static and designed for specific applications. We present a programmable waveguide array in which the Hamiltonian terms can be individually electro-optically tuned to implement various Hamiltonian continuous-time evolutions on a single device. We used a single array with 11 waveguides in lithium niobate, controlled via 22 electrodes, to perform a range of experiments that realized the Su-Schriffer-Heeger model, the Aubrey-Andre model, and Anderson localization, which is equivalent to over 2500 static devices. Our architecture's micron-scale local electric fields overcome the cross-talk limitations of thermo-optic phase shifters in other platforms such as silicon, silicon-nitride, and silica. Electro-optic control allows for ultra-fast and more precise reconfigurability with lower power consumption, and with quantum input states, our platform can enable the study of multiple condensed matter quantum dynamics with a single device.

Identifiers

PMID38167664
PMCPMC10761861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.