ArticleScientific reports2024
High left ventricular mass associated with increased risk of incident diabetes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prognostic Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on Mortality in Diabetes Patients With and Without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Neck Circumference and the Heart: Unveiling a New Anthropometric Marker for LVH Risk in Type 2 Diabetes-The TESEO Study.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2025Article
- Body shape index: an index for early target organ damage in hypertension.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Independent risk factors of left ventricular hypertrophy in non-diabetic individuals in Sierra Leone - a cross-sectional study.Lipids in health and disease · 2024Article
- New Mechanisms to Prevent Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonism (GLP-1 RA) in Metabolic Syndrome and in Type 2 Diabetes: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence for the role of electrocardiography or echocardiography in determining left ventricular hypertrophy for the risk of diabetes is still controversial. We aimed to explore whether left ventricular mass, as measured by these methods, is associated with the risk of diabetes in a community population. We recruited 2696 participants aged 35 years or older without diabetes who had undergone screening with electrocardiography and echocardiography. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was calculated using a formula, and participants were divided into tertiles based on their LVMI tertiles. During a median follow-up period of median, 8.9 years, a total of 405 participants developed diabetes. The incidence and risk of diabetes significantly increased with higher LVMI tertiles. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that individuals in the highest LVMI tertile had a greater likelihood of developing incident diabetes, with a hazard ratio of 1.40 (95% CI 1.06-1.91), even after adjusting related covariates. The highest risk of diabetes was observed in the presence of both the uppermost LVMI tertile and electrocardiographically determined left ventricular hypertrophy for the Chinese population. Left ventricular hypertrophy identified by either electrocardiography or echo may serve as a surrogate marker for identifying the risk of diabetes in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.