ArticleScientific reports2024
Interaural and sex differences in the natural evolution of hearing levels in pre-symptomatic and symptomatic carriers of the p.Pro51Ser variant in the COCH gene.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimodal biomarkers in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: integrating immune, vascular, and metabolic perspectives for precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- [The cochlear extracellular matrix gene mutations and hearing loss].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025Review
- Sex and environment shape cochlear sensitivity in human populations worldwide.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Early Deficits in Speech Perception in Carriers of the p.Pro51Ser Variant in the <italic>COCH</italic> Gene: A Prospective Longitudinal Evaluation of Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing impairment constitutes a significant health problem in developed countries. If hearing loss is slowly progressive, the first signs may not be noticed in time, or remain untreated until the moment the auditory dysfunction becomes more apparent. The present study will focus on DFNA9, an autosomal dominant disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the COCH gene. Although several cross-sectional studies on this topic have been conducted, a crucial need for longitudinal research has been reported by many authors. Longitudinal trajectories of individual hearing thresholds were established as function of age and superimposed lowess curves were generated for 101 female and male carriers of the p.Pro51Ser variant. The average number of times patients have been tested was 2.49 years with a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 4 years. In addition, interaural and sex differences were studied, as they could modify the natural evolution of the hearing function. The current study demonstrates that, both in female carriers and male carriers, the first signs of hearing decline, i.e. hearing thresholds of 20 dB HL, become apparent as early as the 3rd decade in the highest frequencies. In addition, a rapid progression of SNHL occurs between 40 and 50 years of age. Differences between male and female carriers in the progression of hearing loss are most obvious between the age of 50 and 65 years. Furthermore, interaural discrepancies also manifest from the age of 50 years onwards. High-quality prospective data on the long-term natural evolution of hearing levels offer the opportunity to identify different disease stages in each cochlea and different types of evolution. This will provide more insights in the window of opportunity for future therapeutic intervention trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.