ArticleScientific reports2024
Effects of different alkylating agents on photoreceptor degeneration and proliferative response of Müller glia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vivo and ex vivo evaluation of the responses of rat Müller glia after injury.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A MERTK-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate Selectively Depletes M2 Tumor-Associated Macrophages and MERTK-Expressing Cancer Cells.Cancer research · 2026Article
- An APE1 Redox Inhibitor Attenuates Pathological Retinal Vascularization by Suppressing FGF2 Angiogenic Signaling.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Comprehensive transcriptomic analysis reveals canonical and novel pathways modulated by nanoceria in mammalian retinal degeneration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Animal models for retinal degeneration are essential for elucidating its pathogenesis and developing new therapeutic strategies in humans. N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU) has been extensively used to construct a photoreceptor-specific degeneration model, which has served to unveil the molecular process of photoreceptor degeneration as well as the mechanisms regulating the protective responses of remaining cells. Methyl methanesulphonate (MMS), also known to cause photoreceptor degeneration, is considered a good alternative to MNU due to its higher usability; however, detailed pathophysiological processes after MMS treatment remain uncharacterized. Here, we analyzed the time course of photoreceptor degeneration, Müller glial proliferation, and expression of secretory factors after MNU and MMS treatments in rats. While the timing of rod degeneration was similar between the treatments, we unexpectedly found that cones survived slightly longer after MMS treatment. Müller glia reentered the cell cycle at a similar timing after the two treatments; however, the G1/S transition occurred earlier after MMS treatment. Moreover, growth factors such as FGF2 and LIF were more highly upregulated in the MMS model. These data suggest that comparative analyses of the two injury models may be beneficial for understanding the complex regulatory mechanisms underlying the proliferative response of Müller glia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.