Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38167428›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

CW_ICA: an efficient dimensionality determination method for independent component analysis.

Yuyan Yi, Nedret Billor, Arne Ekstrom, Jingyi Zheng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuyan YiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Nedret BillorDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Arne EkstromDepartment of Psychology and Evelyn McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.
Jingyi ZhengDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA. jingyi.zheng@auburn.edu.
Auburn University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

National Dissemination of I-Corps@NCATS: Accelerating Translation through CommercializationUL1TR003096 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GUTIERREZ, ORLANDO M, KIMBERLY, ROBERT P. · 2019 to 2023
$43.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a widely used blind source separation method for signal pre-processing. The determination of the number of independent components (ICs) is crucial for achieving optimal performance, as an incorrect choice can result in either under-decomposition or over-decomposition. In this study, we propose a robust method to automatically determine the optimal number of ICs, named the column-wise independent component analysis (CW_ICA). CW_ICA divides the mixed signals into two blocks and applies ICA separately to each block. A quantitative measure, derived from the rank-based correlation matrix computed from the ICs of the two blocks, is utilized to determine the optimal number of ICs. The proposed method is validated and compared with the existing determination methods using simulation and scalp EEG data. The results demonstrate that CW_ICA is a reliable and robust approach for determining the optimal number of ICs. It offers computational efficiency and can be seamlessly integrated with different ICA methods.

Identifiers

PMID38167428
PMCPMC10762178
OpenAlexW4390509007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.