Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38167407›Full record

ArticleNPJ microgravity2024

Ocular complaints and diagnoses in spaceflight.

Elana Meer, Seanna R Grob, Kris Lehnhardt, Aenor Sawyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ microgravity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elana MeerWayne and Gladys Valley Center for Vision, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. elana.meer@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1100-4923
Seanna R GrobWayne and Gladys Valley Center for Vision, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kris LehnhardtExploration Medical Capability, NASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Aenor SawyerUniversity of California Space Health Program, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-5743
University of California, San Francisco · USJohnson Space Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NASA human system risk board (HSRB) has long focused on trauma and acute medical illness as a key contributor to high level in-flight medical risk. However, ocular issues, trauma, and complaints during spaceflight are poorly characterized. In a retrospective case series, the NASA data from the life sciences data archieve (LSDA) and the lifetime surveillance of astronaught health (LSAH) was queried for eye related complaints and conditions in spaceflight across international space station (ISS) missions and space shuttle (STS) missions. The ISS dataset included missions from the year 2000 to 2020, and the STS dataset included missions from 1981 to 2011. Data were reviewed and segmented into categories of ocular complaints. 135 STS missions and 63 ISS missions were included in this analysis. Ocular events were only noted across 83 STS missions (61.5%) and 41 ISS missions (65.1%). Overall, the most common ocular complaints were eye irritation (n = 80, 33.1%), ocular foreign body or foreign body sensation (n = 55, 22.7%), dry eye syndromes (n = 38, 15.7%), epiphora or excessive tearing (n = 19, 7.85%). Of all ocular complaints or diagnoses, 9 (3.72%) were considered higher severity (keratitis, corneal ulcer, chemical exposure, and corneal abrasion). However, seemingly none required evacuation from mission. Improved depiction of ocular symptoms and diagnoses, and a more standard classification system and process to describe ocular symptoms, diagnoses, and treatments in space is crucial to provide more effective and comprehensive treatments.

Identifiers

PMID38167407
PMCPMC10762130
OpenAlexW4390499556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.