Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38167204›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

Using hypnotic suggestion in the rehabilitation of working memory capacity after acquired brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Line Sophie Eide, Per-Ola Rike, Silje Endresen Reme, Hildegun Snekkevik, Stephan Rossner, Gunnar Rosen, Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv, Marianne Løvstad

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05287542 (Releasing Residual Cognitive Capacity After Acquired Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05287542 nacompletednot on this map

Releasing Residual Cognitive Capacity After Acquired Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Hypnotic Suggestion in Rehabilitation of Working Memory

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnaas Rehabilitation HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsCognitive Rehabilitation, Brain Injuries, Cognitive Impairment, Working MemoryArmsHypnotic suggestion, Mindfulness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Line Sophie EideSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway. line.eide@sunnaas.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0008-4818
Per-Ola RikeSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway.
Silje Endresen RemeUniversity of Oslo (UiO), Oslo, Norway.
Hildegun SnekkevikSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway.
Stephan RossnerNorwegian Society of Clinical Evidence-Based Hypnosis (NEKEH), Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar RosenNorwegian Society of Clinical Evidence-Based Hypnosis (NEKEH), Oslo, Norway.
Jonas Kristoffer LindeløvAalborg University (AAU), Aalborg, Denmark.
Marianne LøvstadSunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesodden, Norway.

Funding

EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering (Stiftelsen Dam) 2022/FO387023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEstablishment of effective evidence-based interventions in rehabilitation of working memory (WM) deficits after acquired brain injury (ABI) is sorely needed. Despite robust evidence for the efficiency of clinical hypnosis in a wide range of clinical conditions, and improved understanding of mechanisms underlying its effects, the potential of clinical hypnosis in cognitive rehabilitation is underexplored. A recent study has shown large effects of hypnotic suggestion on WM capacity following ABI. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate and explore the replicability of these findings and examine the generalization of treatment effects. The study will also explore possible mechanisms of change.

methodsNinety patients will be recruited from the Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital. Inclusion criteria are nonprogressive ABI, minimum 12-month post-injury, ongoing WM deficits, and age between 18 and 67 years. Patients will be randomized to either (a) an intervention group receiving four weekly 1-h sessions with induction and hypnosis, (b) an active control group receiving four weekly 1-h sessions of induction and mindfulness, or (c) a passive control group without intervention. The targeted procedure consists of suggestions about enhancing WM functions, for example through the instantiation of preinjury WM capacity in the present using age regression or through visualizations of brain plasticity. The non-targeted suggestions contain no explicit mention of ABI- or WM-related abilities. Each participant will be assessed at baseline, immediately after intervention, and 6 months after baseline. The primary outcome is the WM index from WAIS-IV and self- and informant-reported WM subscale from BRIEF-A, a questionnaire exploring executive functioning in everyday life. Secondary outcomes include a cognitive composite score derived from tests measuring processing speed, executive functions, learning capacity and memory, and self-reported measures of emotional distress, quality of life, and community integration. Exploratory measures include self-rated ABI and WM-related self-efficacy. DISCUSSION: Rehabilitation of impaired WM after ABI has hitherto yielded limited transfer effects beyond the training material, i.e., improvement effects on everyday WM capacity, and clinical trials of new interventions are thus warranted. Long-standing empirical evidence demonstrates that hypnosis is an effective therapeutic technique in a wide range of conditions, and recent exploratory research has suggested a high efficacy of hypnosis in improving WM capacity in patients with ABI. However, these extraordinary findings need replication in studies applying scientifically rigorous designs. If successful, our ambition is to provide recommendations and materials to implement hypnotic suggestion as an adjunct treatment following ABI. Study findings may inform future studies exploring the use of clinical hypnosis in other areas of rehabilitation, such as mild TBI, and in other neurological conditions where WM deficit is prominent.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05287542. Registered on March 2022 PROTOCOL VERSION: Protocol version 2.0, December 2023.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesMemory, Short-TermAdolescentAdultAgedExecutive FunctionHumansMemory DisordersMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung AdultAcquired brain injuryClinical hypnosisClinically relevant changesCognitive rehabilitationEveryday functioningMedical hypnosisSelf-efficacyWorking memory capacity

Identifiers

PMID38167204
PMCPMC10759527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.