Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38167152›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2024

Simulated cardiopulmonary bypass: a high fidelity model for developing and accessing clinical perfusion skills.

Bruce E Searles, Jeffrey B Riley, Edward M Darling, Jason R Wiles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bruce E SearlesDepartment of Cardiovascular Perfusion, College of Health Professions, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E. Adams St, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA. searlesb@upstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8269-3597
Jeffrey B RileyDepartment of Cardiovascular Perfusion, College of Health Professions, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E. Adams St, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
Edward M DarlingDepartment of Cardiovascular Perfusion, College of Health Professions, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E. Adams St, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA.
Jason R WilesDepartments of Biology and Science Teaching, College of Arts and Science, Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, novice perfusionists learn and practice clinical skills, during live surgical procedures. The profession's accrediting body is directing schools to implement simulated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) into the curriculum. Unfortunately, no CPB simulation models have been validated. Here we describe the design and application of a CPB simulation model.

methodsA CPB patient simulator was integrated into a representative operative theater and interfaced with a simple manikin, a heart-lung machine (HLM), clinical perfusion circuitry, and equipment. Participants completed a simulation scenario designed to represent a typical CPB procedure before completing an exit survey to assess the fidelity and validity of the experience. Questions were scored using a 5-point Likert scale.

resultsParticipants (n = 81) contributed 953 opinions on 40 questions. The participants reported that the model of simulated CPB (1) realistically presented both the physiologic and technical parameters seen during CPB (n = 347, mean 4.37, SD 0.86), (2) accurately represented the psychological constructs and cognitive mechanisms of the clinical CPB (n = 139, mean 4.24, SD 1.08), (3) requires real clinical skills and reproduces realistic surgical case progression (n = 167, mean 4.38, SD 0.86), and (4) would be effective for teaching, practicing, and assessing the fundamental skills of CPB (n = 300, mean 4.54, SD 0.9). Participants agreed that their performance in the simulation scenario accurately predicted their performance in a real clinical setting (n = 43, mean 4.07, SD 1.03)

conclusionThis novel simulation model of CPB reproduces the salient aspects of clinical CPB and may be useful for teaching, practicing, and assessing fundamental skills.

Indexed as

Cardiac surgeryCardiopulmonary bypassClinical perfusionistEducationFidelitySimulationValidation

Identifiers

PMID38167152
PMCPMC10763050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.