Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166999›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

Optimal reimplantation timing in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection: an observative cohort study in Asian population.

Meng-Lun Tsai, Allen Herng-Shouh Hsu, Cheng-Ta Wu, Po-Chun Lin, Timothy L Tan, Feng-Chih Kuo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Meng-Lun TsaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dapi Road, Niaosong District, 833, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Allen Herng-Shouh HsuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dapi Road, Niaosong District, 833, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Cheng-Ta WuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dapi Road, Niaosong District, 833, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Po-Chun LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dapi Road, Niaosong District, 833, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Timothy L TanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Feng-Chih KuoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dapi Road, Niaosong District, 833, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. fongchikuo@cgmh.org.tw.
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan grant numbers CORPG8N0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal timing for reimplantation for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not been established and varies from a few weeks to several months. The aim of this study was to assess the commendable time between implant removal and reimplantation in patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for PJI.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 361 patients who were treated with two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee chronic PJI at our institution between January 2000 and December 2018. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, surgical variables, microbiology data, and time to reimplantation were recorded. All patients were followed for a minimum of one year. Treatment failure was defined by Delphi criteria. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate survival rates and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of treatment failure.

resultsIn final analysis, 27 (7.5%) had treatment failure. Factors related to treatment failure including interim spacer exchange (OR, 3.13; confidence interval (CI), 1.04-9.09, p = 0.036), higher ESR level at reimplantation (OR, 1.85; CI, 1.05-3.57; p = 0.04), and time to reimplantation (OR, 1.00; CI, 1.003-1.005, p = 0.04). Performing revision arthroplasty surgery from 16 to 20 weeks had highest successful rate. The reimplantation over 24 weeks had a lower successful rate. However, no statistical significance in comparing each interval group.

conclusionOur study emphasized the importance of timely reimplantation in achieving successful outcomes. Factors such as ESR levels, spacer exchange, and the duration of time to reimplantation influenced the likelihood of treatment failure in two-stage exchange arthroplasty for hip and knee PJI.

Indexed as

Arthritis, InfectiousArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeProsthesis-Related InfectionsCohort StudiesHumansReoperationReplantationRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment Outcome2-stage arthroplastyAsianExchange arthroplastyPeriprosthetic joint InfectionReimplantationTime to reimplantTiming of reimplantation

Identifiers

PMID38166999
PMCPMC10763399
OpenAlexW4390508407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.