Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166982›Full record

Trial reportTrials2024

ERASURE: early autologous blood pleurodesis for postoperative air leaks-a randomized, controlled trial comparing prophylactic autologous blood pleurodesis versus standard watch and wait treatment for postoperative air leaks following thoracoscopic anatomic lung resections.

Ioannis Karampinis, Christian Ruckes, Fabian Doerr, Servet Bölükbas, Sara Ricciardi, Giuseppe Cardillo, Carlos Galvez, Bogdan Vidmar, Tomaz Stupnik, Vincent Fang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Ioannis KarampinisDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Thoracic Diseases, Mainz University, Mainz, Germany.
Christian RuckesInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials (IZKS Mainz), Mainz University, Mainz, Germany.
Fabian DoerrDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen-Ruhrlandclinic, Essen, Germany.
Servet BölükbasDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Medicine Essen-Ruhrlandclinic, Essen, Germany.
Sara RicciardiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe CardilloDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy.
Carlos GalvezDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Bogdan VidmarDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomaz StupnikDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vincent FangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Rene Horsleben PetersenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eric Dominic RoessnerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Centre for Thoracic Diseases, Mainz University, Mainz, Germany. eric.roessner@unimedizin-mainz.de.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini · ITLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIRuhrlandklinik · DEHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESShanghai Chest Hospital · CNUniversity of Applied Sciences Mainz · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prolonged air leak is probably the most common complication following lung resections. Around 10-20% of the patients who undergo a lung resection will eventually develop a prolonged air leak. The definition of a prolonged air leak varies between an air leak, which is evident after the fifth, seventh or even tenth postoperative day to every air leak that prolongs the hospital stay. However, the postoperative hospital stay following a thoracoscopic lobectomy can be as short as 2 days, making the above definitions sound outdated. The treatment of these air leaks is also very versatile. One of the broadly accepted treatment options is the autologous blood pleurodesis or "blood patch". The purpose of this trial is to investigate the impact of a prophylactic autologous blood pleurodesis on reducing the duration of the postoperative air leak and therefore prevent the air leak from becoming prolonged.

methodsPatients undergoing an elective thoracoscopic anatomic lung resection for primary lung cancer or metastatic disease will be eligible for recruitment. Patients with an air leak of > 100 ml/min within 6 h prior to the morning round on the second postoperative day will be eligible for inclusion in the study and randomization. Patients will be randomized to either blood pleurodesis or watchful waiting. The primary endpoint is the time to drain removal measured in full days. The trial ends on the seventh postoperative day. DISCUSSION: The early autologous blood pleurodesis could lead to a faster cessation of the air leak and therefore to a faster removal of the drain. A faster removal of the drain would relieve the patient from all the well-known drain-associated complications (longer hospital stay, stronger postoperative pain, risk of drain-associated infection, etc.). From the economical point of view, faster drain removal would reduce the hospital costs as well as the costs associated with the care of a patient with a chest drain in an outpatient setting.

trial registrationGerman Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00030810. 27 December 2022.

Indexed as

PleurodesisPostoperative ComplicationsDevice RemovalDrainageHumansLungPneumonectomyBlood patchLobectomyLung surgeryPleurodesisProlonged air leakSegmentectomy

Identifiers

PMID38166982
PMCPMC10763257
OpenAlexW4390496296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.