Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166863›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Factors intervening in the childbirth experience: a mixed-methods study.

Luciana Braz de Oliveira Paes, Márcia Regina Cangiani Fabbro, Beatriz Rosana Gonçalves de Oliveira Toso, Jamile Claro de Castro Bussadori, Mariana Torreglosa Ruiz, Natália Rejane Salim, Monika Wernet, Aline Oliveira Silveira, Flávia Corrêa Porto de Abreu D Agostini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Luciana Braz de Oliveira PaesFederal University of Sao Carlos, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Rod. Washington Luís, s/n, Brazil. Luciana_brazsp@hotmail.com.
Márcia Regina Cangiani FabbroFederal University of Sao Carlos, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Rod. Washington Luís, s/n, Brazil.
Beatriz Rosana Gonçalves de Oliveira TosoWestern Paraná State University, Cascavel Campus, Paraná, Brazil.
Jamile Claro de Castro BussadoriFederal University of Sao Carlos, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Rod. Washington Luís, s/n, Brazil.
Mariana Torreglosa RuizFederal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil.
Natália Rejane SalimFederal University of Sao Carlos, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Rod. Washington Luís, s/n, Brazil.
Monika WernetFederal University of Sao Carlos, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Rod. Washington Luís, s/n, Brazil.
Aline Oliveira SilveiraUniversity of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Flávia Corrêa Porto de Abreu D AgostiniFederal University of Sao Carlos, São Carlos, SP, 13565-905, Rod. Washington Luís, s/n, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Estadual do Paraná · BRUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the childbirth experience focusing on the intervening factors and on the delivery method.

methodA sequential and explanatory mixed-methods study guided by the World Health Organization document for positive childbirth experiences. The participants were puerperal women in a maternity teaching hospital from inland São Paulo (Brazil). The first quantitative stage involved descriptive analysis with Poisson regression of 265 answers to the "Termômetro da Iniciativa Hospital Amigo da Mulher e da Criança" ("Women- and Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Thermometer") questionnaire. The second stage, qualitative, thematically analyzed the interviews conducted with 44 puerperal women who took part in the first stage. Data integration was by connection. THE RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The analysis by connection showed that among the factors that restricted the positive experience, C-section was predominant (61.9%), understood as an option due to fear of pain, the treatment modality and previous traumas. Restrictions referring to the presence of a companion (99.6%), not having privacy (83%), disrespectful situations (69.5%), too many touches (56.9%) and the absence of skin-to-skin contact (55%), among others, potentiated fear, loneliness, concern, shame, the perception of disrespect and insecurity with the assistance provided. The promoting factors were as follows: choosing the companion (95.4%) for collaborating in the safety perception, not having infections (83.9%), having continuous team monitoring (82.2%) and pain relief methods (78.9%), which were valued by the women.

conclusionThe intervening factors that promoted positive experiences were related to clinical and protocol-related issues and to service availability. The restrictive factors were associated with excess interventions, deprivation of rights and of choice, absence of privacy and restriction referring to the presence of a companion. Women with a normal postpartum period felt more insecure and disrespected when compared to those subjected to C-sections, whose choices were considered, although they had lower prevalence of skin-to-skin contact. There is an urgent need to apprehend women's experiences and turn them into actions that guarantee their lives in a safe and respectful way.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesParturitionBrazilDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPainPostpartum PeriodPregnancyDeliveryLife-changing eventsMixed-methods studies womenPostpartum period

Identifiers

PMID38166863
PMCPMC10759435
OpenAlexW4390495203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.