ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
A validation of an entropy-based artificial intelligence for ultrasound data in breast tumors.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning radiomics based on intra and peri tumor PA/US images distinguish between luminal and non-luminal tumors in breast cancers.Photoacoustics · 2024Article
- Optimizing breast cancer diagnosis with photoacoustic imaging: An analysis of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics.Photoacoustics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the ultrasound (US) diagnosis of breast cancer (BCa) is increasingly prevalent. However, the impact of US-probe frequencies on the diagnostic efficacy of AI models has not been clearly established.
objectivesTo explore the impact of using US-video of variable frequencies on the diagnostic efficacy of AI in breast US screening.
methodsThis study utilized different frequency US-probes (L14: frequency range: 3.0-14.0 MHz, central frequency 9 MHz, L9: frequency range: 2.5-9.0 MHz, central frequency 6.5 MHz and L13: frequency range: 3.6-13.5 MHz, central frequency 8 MHz, L7: frequency range: 3-7 MHz, central frequency 4.0 MHz, linear arrays) to collect breast-video and applied an entropy-based deep learning approach for evaluation. We analyzed the average two-dimensional image entropy (2-DIE) of these videos and the performance of AI models in processing videos from these different frequencies to assess how probe frequency affects AI diagnostic performance.
resultsThe study found that in testing set 1, L9 was higher than L14 in average 2-DIE; in testing set 2, L13 was higher in average 2-DIE than L7. The diagnostic efficacy of US-data, utilized in AI model analysis, varied across different frequencies (AUC: L9 > L14: 0.849 vs. 0.784; L13 > L7: 0.920 vs. 0.887).
conclusionThis study indicate that US-data acquired using probes with varying frequencies exhibit diverse average 2-DIE values, and datasets characterized by higher average 2-DIE demonstrate enhanced diagnostic outcomes in AI-driven BCa diagnosis. Unlike other studies, our research emphasizes the importance of US-probe frequency selection on AI model diagnostic performance, rather than focusing solely on the AI algorithms themselves. These insights offer a new perspective for early BCa screening and diagnosis and are of significant for future choices of US equipment and optimization of AI algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.