Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166782›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a prospective study.

Ali Torkaman, Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, Elham Mohammadyahya, Parsa Torkaman, Mohammad Reza Bahaeddini, Amir Aminian, Hamed Tayyebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali TorkamanDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi HosseinzadehDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Elham MohammadyahyaDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Parsa TorkamanDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad Reza BahaeddiniDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir AminianDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed TayyebiDepartment of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. hamedtayebi65@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5003-0118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no clear consensus regarding the superiority of a combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) versus an isolated ACLR. In this study, we compared the postoperative stability profile, complications, and patient-reported outcomes of these procedures.

methodsTwenty-one patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear who were either treated by an isolated all-inside ACLR (n = 21) or a combined all-inside ACLR and ALLR (n = 20) were included. The outcomes were evaluated in the last follow-up and included the postoperative stability profile evaluated by the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and KT-1000 side-to-side difference, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm knee scale.

resultsThe baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. The residual Lachman and pivot shift were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.41 and P = 0.18, respectively). The mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 1.93 ± 1.9 mm in the isolated and 1.635 ± 0.91 mm in the combined group (P = 0.01). The mean improvement of the IKDC score was not significantly different between the isolated and combined groups (24.7 vs. 25.2, P = 0.28). The mean improvement of the Lysholm scale was not significantly different between the isolated and combined groups (33.5 vs. 34.1, P = 0.19). ACL re-rupture occurred in three patients of the isolated group and no patient of the combined group.

conclusionThe outcomes of patients in the present study support performing a combined ALL and ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAnterior Cruciate LigamentFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnterior cruciate ligamentAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionAnterolateral

Identifiers

PMID38166782
PMCPMC10759739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.