Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166712›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024

Roast: a tool for reference-free optimization of supertranscriptome assemblies.

Madiha Shabbir, Aziz Mithani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Madiha ShabbirDepartment of Life Sciences, Syed Babar Ali School of Science and Engineering, Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), DHA, Lahore, 54792, Pakistan.
Aziz MithaniDepartment of Life Sciences, Syed Babar Ali School of Science and Engineering, Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS), DHA, Lahore, 54792, Pakistan. aziz@cantab.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscriptomic studies involving organisms for which reference genomes are not available typically start by generating de novo transcriptome or supertranscriptome assembly from the raw RNA-seq reads. Assembling a supertranscriptome is, however, a challenging task due to significantly varying abundance of mRNA transcripts, alternative splicing, and sequencing errors. As a result, popular de novo supertranscriptome assembly tools generate assemblies containing contigs that are partially-assembled, fragmented, false chimeras or have local mis-assemblies leading to decreased assembly accuracy. Commonly available tools for assembly improvement rely primarily on running BLAST using closely related species making their accuracy and reliability conditioned on the availability of the data for closely related organisms.

resultsWe present ROAST, a tool for optimization of supertranscriptome assemblies that uses paired-end RNA-seq data from Illumina sequencing platform to iteratively identify and fix assembly errors solely using the error signatures generated by RNA-seq alignment tools including soft-clips, unexpected expression coverage, and reads with mates unmapped or mapped on a different contig to identify and fix various supertranscriptome assembly errors without performing BLAST searches against other organisms. Evaluation results using simulated as well as real datasets show that ROAST significantly improves assembly quality by identifying and fixing various assembly errors.

conclusionROAST provides a reference-free approach to optimizing supertranscriptome assemblies highlighting its utility in refining de novo supertranscriptome assemblies of non-model organisms.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingReproducibility of ResultsAssembly errorsAssembly improvementReference-free optimizationRNA-seqSupertranscriptSupertranscriptome assembly

Identifiers

PMID38166712
PMCPMC10763045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.