Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166695›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Clinical application of vancomycin TDM in ventilated patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.

Xiaowu Zhang, Yulin Wu, Donghao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaowu ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, He Xi District, Tianjin, 300060, China. zhangxiaowu1986@163.com.
Yulin WuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, He Xi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Donghao WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan-Hu-Xi Road, Ti-Yuan-Bei, He Xi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

Tianjin Key Medical Discipline (Specialty) Construction Project TJYXZDXK-009A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTherapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin is widely recommended for clinical treatment. Due to the complexity of 24-h area under the curve (AUC) guided vancomycin monitoring in clinical practice, the vancomycin trough level remains the most common and practical method. The purpose of this study was designed to investigate the differences in the safety and efficacies of vancomycin TDM based on the two different monitoring methods, and further explore the clinical application of trough-guided vancomycin monitoring in patients with gastrointestinal cancer requiring mechanical ventilation.

methodsWe included a total of 78 gastrointestinal cancer patients who required mechanical ventilation due to various diseases. All patients included in this study were aged 18 years or older and were treated with intravenous vancomycin therapy for more than 2 days due to documented or suspected Gram-positive bacterial infections, and have at least one available vancomycin plasma concentration. First, we compared the safety and efficacies of vancomycin TDM based on different monitoring methods as trough-guided monitoring or AUC-guided monitoring. Then, based on whether the initial vancomycin concentration achieving the target trough concentration (less than 48 h), patients were divided into early and delayed groups, and the clinical factors were compared between them. The primary endpoints include the incidence of new-onset acute kidney injury (AKI) or renal replacement therapy (RRT), clinical success rate and 28-day all-cause mortality. Finally, the overall relationship between trough concentration and potential covariates is screened by univariate and multivariate analysis to explore potential information covariates.

resultsThe research revealed that patients with gastrointestinal cancer exhibited significantly lower initial vancomycin trough concentrations (median [interquartile range (IQR)]: 6.90[5.28-11.20] mg/L). And there were no statistically significant differences in the safety and efficacies of vancomycin TDM based on the two different monitoring methods for the primary endpoint. Moreover, base on trough-guided vancomycin monitoring, the early group demonstrated a notably shorter duration of mechanical ventilation compared with the delayed group (χ

conclusionsTrough-guided vancomycin monitoring is a simple and effective marker of TDM for ventilated patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Timely achievement of target trough concentrations for vancomycin can improve partial clinical outcomes in Gram-positive bacterial infections. Cys-C level is a potentially valuable parameter for predicting the vancomycin concentration.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveDrug MonitoringHumansRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycinGastrointestinal cancerTherapeutic drug monitoringVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID38166695
PMCPMC10759445
OpenAlexW4390501256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.