Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166457›Full record

Observational studyJDR clinical and translational research2024

Dental Surgical Activity in Hospitals during COVID-19: A Nationwide Observational Cohort Study.

J Booth, A J Fowler, R Pearse, P Dias, Y I Wan, R Witton, T E F Abbott

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JDR clinical and translational research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J BoothDental Public Health and Primary Care, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-8844
A J FowlerCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
R PearseCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
P DiasCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1740-6165
Y I WanCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
R WittonPeninsula Dental School, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, UK.
T E F AbbottCritical Care and Perioperative Medicine Research Group, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe number of surgical extractions performed in hospitals in England remains unclear. This study reports the volume of surgical extractions conducted in hospitals and change in activity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide observational cohort study using Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) in England for patients undergoing surgical removal of a tooth (defined using OPSC-4 code F09) between April 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Procedures were stratified by age, gender, and urgency (elective or nonelective), reported using descriptive statistics, number, and percentage. We conducted post hoc modeling to predict surgical activity to December 2023. In addition, we contrasted this with aggregate national data on simple dental extraction procedures and drainage of dental abscesses in hospital as well as dental activity in general practice.

resultsWe identified a total of 569,938 episodes for the surgical removal of a tooth (females 57%). Of these, 493,056/569,938 (87%) were for adults and 76,882/569,938 (13%) children ≤18 years. Surgical extractions were most frequent in adult females. Elective cases accounted for 96% (

conclusionsThe number of surgical extractions taking place in hospitals during the pandemic fell by 56%. The true impact of this reduction is unknown, but delayed treatment increases the risk of complications, including life-threatening infections. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: The result of this study provides an evidence-based overview of the trends relating to surgical extractions of teeth in England taking place in hospitals. This information can be used to inform service and workforce planning to meet the needs of patients requiring surgical extractions. The data also provide an insight into the oral health needs of the population in England.

Indexed as

COVID-19Tooth ExtractionAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHospitalsHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPandemicscohort studiesdental public healthhealth services researchhospital dentistryoral and maxillofacial surgeryoral surgery

Identifiers

PMID38166457
PMCPMC11409558
OpenAlexW4390537894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.