Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166139›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

The role of naturally acquired intracellular Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the development of Acanthamoeba keratitis in an animal model.

Binod Rayamajhee, Mark Willcox, Fiona L Henriquez, Ajay Kumar Vijay, Constantinos Petsoglou, Gauri Shankar Shrestha, Hari Kumar Peguda, Nicole Carnt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. First report on the infection ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Journal of medical microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Free-living amoebae and their role inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. First Report ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Binod RayamajheeSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3007-8901
Mark WillcoxSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Fiona L HenriquezSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Blantyre, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ajay Kumar VijaySchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Constantinos PetsoglouSydney and Sydney Eye Hospital, Southeastern Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Gauri Shankar ShresthaSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Hari Kumar PegudaSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Nicole CarntSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of the West of Scotland · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcanthamoeba is an environmental host for various microorganisms. Acanthamoeba is also becoming an increasingly important pathogen as a cause of keratitis. In Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK), coinfections involving pathogenic bacteria have been reported, potentially attributed to the carriage of microbes by Acanthamoeba. This study assessed the presence of intracellular bacteria in Acanthamoeba species recovered from domestic tap water and corneas of two different AK patients and examined the impact of naturally occurring intracellular bacteria within Acanthamoeba on the severity of corneal infections in rats. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHousehold water and corneal swabs were collected from AK patients. Acanthamoeba strains and genotypes were confirmed by sequencing. Acanthamoeba isolates were assessed for the presence of intracellular bacteria using sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and electron microscopy. The viability of the bacteria in Acanthamoeba was assessed by labelling with alkyne-functionalized D-alanine (alkDala). Primary human macrophages were used to compare the intracellular survival and replication of the endosymbiotic Pseudomonas aeruginosa and a wild type strain. Eyes of rats were challenged intrastromally with Acanthamoeba containing or devoid of P. aeruginosa and evaluated for the clinical response. Domestic water and corneal swabs were positive for Acanthamoeba. Both strains belonged to genotype T4F. One of the Acanthamoeba isolates harboured P. aeruginosa which was seen throughout the Acanthamoeba's cytoplasm. It was metabolically active and could be seen undergoing binary fission. This motile strain was able to replicate in macrophage to a greater degree than strain PAO1 (p<0.05). Inoculation of Acanthamoeba containing the intracellular P. aeruginosa in rats eyes resulted in a severe keratitis with increased neutrophil response. Acanthamoeba alone induced milder keratitis. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings indicate the presence of live intracellular bacteria in Acanthamoeba can increase the severity of acute keratitis in vivo. As P. aeruginosa is a common cause of keratitis, this may indicate the potential for these intracellular bacteria in Acanthamoeba to lead to severe polymicrobial keratitis.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAnimalsBacteriaHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceModels, AnimalPseudomonas aeruginosaRatsWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID38166139
PMCPMC10795995
OpenAlexW4390495160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.