Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38166114›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science & technology2024

Mass-Balance-Consistent Geological Stock Accounting: A New Approach toward Sustainable Management of Mineral Resources.

Mark U Simoni, Johannes A Drielsma, Magnus Ericsson, Andrew G Gunn, Sigurd Heiberg, Tom A Heldal, Nedal T Nassar, Evi Petavratzi, Daniel B Müller

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark U SimoniGeological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7040 Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9253-9569
Johannes A DrielsmaDrielsma Resources Europe, 2585 GT The Hague, Netherlands.
Magnus EricssonLuleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, 97187 Luleå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6395-1001
Andrew G GunnBritish Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, United Kingdom.
Sigurd HeibergPetronavit AS, C/o Heiberg, Stokkahagen 23, 4022 Stavanger, Norway.
Tom A HeldalGeological Survey of Norway, Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7040 Trondheim, Norway.
Nedal T NassarU.S. Geological Survey, National Mineral Information Center, 12201 Sunrise Valley Dr., MS 988, Reston, Virginia 20192, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8758-9732
Evi PetavratziBritish Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, United Kingdom.
Daniel B MüllerNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Industrial Ecology Programme, Høgskoleringen 5, NO-7034 Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global resource extraction raises concerns about environmental pressures and the security of mineral supply. Strategies to address these concerns depend on robust information on natural resource endowments, and on suitable methods to monitor and model their changes over time. However, current mineral resources and reserves reporting and accounting workflows are poorly suited for addressing mineral depletion or answering questions about the long-term sustainable supply. Our integrative review finds that the lack of a robust theoretical concept and framework for mass-balance (MB)-consistent geological stock accounting hinders systematic industry-government data integration, resource governance, and strategy development. We evaluate the existing literature on geological stock accounting, identify shortcomings of current monitoring of mine production, and outline a conceptual framework for MB-consistent system integration based on material flow analysis (MFA). Our synthesis shows that recent developments in Earth observation, geoinformation management, and sustainability reporting act as catalysts that make MB-consistent geological stock accounting increasingly feasible. We propose first steps for its implementation and anticipate that our perspective as "resource realists" will facilitate the integration of geological and anthropogenic material systems, help secure future mineral supply, and support the global sustainability transition.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesMineralsMineralsdigital economygeoinformation managementmaterial flow analysis (MFA)mineral depletionmineral resourcessustainability reportingUnited Nations Framework Classification for Resources (UNFC)

Identifiers

PMID38166114
PMCPMC10795188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.