SynthesisPloS one2024
QuantiFERON Gold-In-Tube for the diagnosis of mycobacterial tuberculosis infection in children under 5 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interferon-Gamma Release Assay Testing for Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Health Technology Assessment.Ontario health technology assessment series · 2024Pooled it
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Specific CFP-10/ESAT-6 CD4 and CD8 T-Cell Non-IFN-γ+ Responses Are Common in Young Kenyan Children Despite Low Reported Tuberculosis Exposure.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious meta-analysis regarding the performance of QuantiFERON Gold-In-Tube in children have yielded contrasting results. Emerging data in children younger than 5 years of age necessitates a new analysis.
methodsSystematic searches were conducted of MedLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases between 1998-2023. Pooled estimates of sensitivities and specificities of QFT-GIT compared to tuberculin skin test (TST) were calculated. The Kappa (k) coefficient was calculated for each study to determine the degree of congruence between TST and QFT-GIT results. Studies including patients co-infected with HIV or other immune compromising conditions or those treated with anti-tubercular treatment were excluded.
resultsSeventeen studies (4335 patients) were included in quantitative analysis. All studies were conducted in middle to high income countries. They were conducted across 14 countries and 4 studies in countries with high TB incidence. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 0.45 (0.42-0.48), 0.96 (0.96-0.97) and 18.84 (7.33-48.41) respectively. The ability of QFT-GIT to discriminate with disease and no disease was "good" as demonstrated by a summary receiver operating characteristic curve with area under curve of 0.7812. The average Kappa (k) co-efficient was 0.501 with a wide variety of values between studies (0.167 to 0.800).
conclusionThe findings of this meta-analysis support the judicious use of QFT-GIT in children 5 years and under, with caution as a sole test to exclude Tuberculosis in this age group. The heterogeneity and methodological quality of diagnostic studies limits the generalisability of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.