Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165988›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Living on the edge: Crayfish as drivers to anoxification of their own shelter microenvironment.

Adrian Neculae, Zanethia C Barnett, Kristian Miok, Marcelo M Dalosto, Iryna Kuklina, Tadashi Kawai, Sandro Santos, James M Furse, Ovidiu I Sîrbu, James A Stoeckel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adrian NeculaeFaculty of Physics, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.
Zanethia C BarnettCenter for Bottomland Hardwoods Research, Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Oxford, MS, United States of Ameirca.
Kristian MiokCrayfish Research Centre, Institute for Advanced Environmental Research, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.
Marcelo M DalostoLaboratório de Carcinologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Iryna KuklinaSouth Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czech Republic.
Tadashi KawaiCentral Fisheries Research Institute, Yoichi, Hokkaido, Japan.
Sandro SantosLaboratório de Carcinologia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
James M FurseCoastal and Marine Research Centre, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
Ovidiu I SîrbuDepartment of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.
James A StoeckelSchool of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America.
Lucian PârvulescuCrayfish Research Centre, Institute for Advanced Environmental Research, West University of Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1528-1429

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burrowing is a common trait among crayfish thought to help species deal with adverse environmental challenges. However, little is known about the microhabitat ecology of crayfish taxa in relation to their burrows. To fill this knowledge gap, we assessed the availability of oxygen inside the crayfish shelter by series of in-vivo and in-silico modelling experiments. Under modeled condition, we found that, except for the entrance region of the 200 mm, a flooded burrow microenvironment became anoxic within 8 h, on average. Multiple 12-hour day-night cycles, with burrows occupied by crayfish for 12 h and empty for 12 h, were not sufficient for refreshing the burrow microenvironment. We then examined the degree to which crayfish species with different propensities for burrowing are tolerant of self-created anoxia. From these experiments, primary and secondary burrowers showed best and most consistent tolerance-exhibiting ≥ 64% survival to anoxia and 25-91% survival of ≥ 9 h at anoxia, respectively. Tertiary burrowers exhibited little to no tolerance of anoxia with 0-50% survival to anoxia and only one species exhibiting survival (2%) of ≥ 9 h at anoxia. Results suggest that moderate to strongly burrowing crayfish can quickly draw down the dissolved oxygen in burrow water but appear to have conserved a legacy of strong tolerance of anoxia from their monophyletic ancestors-the lobsters-whereas tertiary burrowers have lost (or never evolved) this ability.

Indexed as

AstacoideaDecapodaAnimalsEcologyHypoxiaOxygenWaterOxygenWater

Identifiers

PMID38165988
PMCPMC10760702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.