Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165968›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Hot alkaline lysis gDNA extraction from formalin-fixed archival tissues.

Erin E Hahn, Marina Alexander, Jiri Stiller, Peter M Grewe, Clare E Holleley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin E HahnNational Research Collections Australia, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6459-9508
Marina AlexanderNational Research Collections Australia, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Jiri StillerAgriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Peter M GreweEnvironment, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Clare E HolleleyNational Research Collections Australia, Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Australian National Insect Collection · AUAgriculture and Food · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Formalin fixation of natural history specimens and histopathological material has historically been viewed as an impediment to successful genomic analysis. However, the development of extraction methods specifically tailored to contend with heavily crosslinked archival tissues, re-contextualises millions of previously overlooked specimens as viable molecular assets. Here, we present an easy-to-follow protocol for screening archival wet specimens for molecular viability and subsequent genomic DNA extraction suitable for sequencing. The protocol begins with non-destructive assessment of specimen degradation and preservation media conditions to allow both museum curators and researchers to select specimens most likely to yield an acceptable proportion (20-60%) of mappable endogenous DNA during short-read DNA sequencing. The extraction protocol uses hot alkaline lysis in buffer (0.1M NaOH, 1% SDS, pH 13) to simultaneously lyse and de-crosslink the tissue. To maximise DNA recovery, phenol:chloroform extraction is coupled with a small-fragment optimised SPRI bead clean up. Applied to well-preserved archival tissues, the protocol can yield 1-2 μg DNA per 50 mg of tissue with mean fragment sizes typically ranging from 50-150 bp, which is suitable to recover genomic DNA sufficient to reconstruct complete mitochondrial genomes and achieve up to 25X nuclear genome coverage. We provide guidance for read mapping to a reference genome and discuss the limitations of relying on small fragments for SNP genotyping and de novo genome assembly. This protocol opens the door to broader-scale genetic and phylogenetic analysis of historical specimens, contributing to a deeper understanding of evolutionary trends and adaptation in response to changing environments.

Indexed as

FormaldehydeGenome, MitochondrialDNAPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNAFormaldehyde

Identifiers

PMID38165968
PMCPMC10760679
OpenAlexW4390496472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.