Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165900›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2024

Clinical factors associated with the therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter prospective observational study.

Machiko Kai, Hayato Hikita, Maesaka Kazuki, Yuki Tahata, Kazuma Shinkai, Akira Doi, Kazuyoshi Ohkawa, Masanori Miyazaki, Hisashi Ishida, Kengo Matsumoto and 18 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Machiko KaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hayato HikitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Maesaka KazukiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yuki TahataDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuma ShinkaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Akira DoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Kazuyoshi OhkawaDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Masanori MiyazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Hisashi IshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ikeda Municipal Hospital, Ikeda, Osaka, Japan.
Kengo MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan.
Yasutoshi NozakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan.
Takayuki YakushijinDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Ryotaro SakamoriDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1580-607X
Akira KanekoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Sadaharu IioDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hyogo Prefectural Nishinomiya Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Takatoshi NawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Osaka, Japan.
Naruyasu KakitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Kaizuka, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki MorishitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki HiramatsuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
Takeo UsuiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ashiya Municipal Hospital, Ashiya, Hyogo, Japan.
Kazuho ImanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Itami City Hospital, Itami, Hyogo, Japan.
Yoshinori DoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Mitsuru SakakibaraDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Osaka, Japan.
Yuichi YoshidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Suita Municipal Hospital, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tsugiko OzeDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Koga Community Hospital, Yaidu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takahiro KodamaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohide TatsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tetsuo TakeharaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5036-3457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment efficiency and predictors of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice have not been established. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and to investigate predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in 19 hospitals were enrolled before treatment and observed prospectively. The outcomes of 222 patients in this cohort were analyzed. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.0% and 70.6%, respectively, whereas the median progression-free survival was 5.7 months. Independent risk factors for shortened progression-free survival were younger age (<75 years; 3.9 months vs. 8.6 months), higher number of intrahepatic tumors (≥5; 4.0 months vs. 7.9 months), macrovascular invasion (2.3 months vs. 6.7 months), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥3.03; 3.0 months vs. 7.8 months). The median overall survival was not reached; however, independent risk factors for shortened overall survival were absence of hyperlipidemia, higher number of intrahepatic tumors (≥5), macrovascular invasion, higher α-fetoprotein level (≥400 ng/mL), worse Child-Pugh score (≥6), and higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥3.03). Severe adverse events (grade ≥3) were observed in 96 patients (36.0%), with proteinuria being the most frequent. In conclusion, patients with older age, lower number of intrahepatic tumors, absent macrovascular invasion, and lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are expected to have better progression-free survival with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBevacizumabHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedatezolizumabBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID38165900
PMCPMC10760712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.