Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165674›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Transition to Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Hospitalized Adults With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.

Drew W Engers, Pranita D Tamma, Suiyini Fiawoo, Karen Fong, Ripal Jariwala, Timothy C Jenkins, Ronald E Kendall, Jae Hyoung Lee, Erin K McCreary, Payal K Patel and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Drew W EngersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Trinity Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Pranita D TammaDepartment of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Suiyini FiawooDepartment of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Karen FongDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City.
Ripal JariwalaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, University of California, San Francisco.
Timothy C JenkinsDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado.
Ronald E KendallDepartment of Pharmacy, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jae Hyoung LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Erin K McCrearyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Payal K PatelDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Intermountain Health, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Katherine C ShihadehDepartment of Pharmacy, Denver Health, Denver, Colorado.
Judianne SlishDepartment of Pharmacy, University of Rochester Medicine-Highland Hospital, Rochester, New York.
Trevor C Van SchooneveldDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Anurag N MalaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Trinity Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Johns Hopkins University · USTrinity Health · USDenver Health Medical Center · USHighland Hospital · USIntermountain Healthcare · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Utah · USVA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Management of gram-negative bloodstream infections (GN-BSIs) with oral antibiotics is highly variable. Objective: To examine the transition from intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotics, including selection, timing, and associated clinical and microbial characteristics, among hospitalized patients with GN-BSIs. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 4581 hospitalized adults with GN-BSIs at 24 US hospitals between January 1 and December 31, 2019. Patients were excluded if they died within 72 hours. Patients were excluded from the oral therapy group if transition occurred after day 7. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 2022 to October 2023. Exposures: Administration of antibiotics for GN-BSIs. Main Outcomes and Measures: Baseline characteristics and clinical parameters reflecting severity of illness were evaluated in groups receiving oral and IV therapy. The prevalence of transition from IV to oral antibiotics by day 7, median day of transition, sources of infection, and oral antibiotic selection were assessed. Results: Of a total of 4581 episodes with GN-BSIs (median age, 67 years [IQR, 55-77 years]; 2389 men [52.2%]), 1969 patients (43.0%) receiving IV antibiotics were transitioned to oral antibiotics by day 7. Patients maintained on IV therapy were more likely than those transitioned to oral therapy to be immunosuppressed (833 of 2612 [31.9%] vs 485 of 1969 [24.6%]; P < .001), require intensive care unit admission (1033 of 2612 [39.5%] vs 334 of 1969 [17.0%]; P < .001), have fever or hypotension as of day 5 (423 of 2612 [16.2%] vs 49 of 1969 [2.5%]; P < .001), require kidney replacement therapy (280 of 2612 [10.7%] vs 63 of 1969 [3.2%]; P < .001), and less likely to have source control within 7 days (1852 of 2612 [70.9%] vs 1577 of 1969 [80.1%]; P < .001). Transitioning patients from IV to oral therapy by day 7 was highly variable across hospitals, ranging from 25.8% (66 of 256) to 65.9% (27 of 41). A total of 4109 patients (89.7%) achieved clinical stability within 5 days. For the 3429 episodes (74.9%) with successful source control by day 7, the median day of source control was day 2 (IQR, 1-3 days) for the oral group and day 2 (IQR, 1-4 days) for the IV group (P < .001). Common infection sources among patients administered oral therapy were the urinary tract (1277 of 1969 [64.9%]), hepatobiliary (239 of 1969 [12.1%]), and intra-abdominal (194 of 1969 [9.9%]). The median day of oral transition was 5 (IQR, 4-6 days). Total duration of antibiotic treatment was significantly shorter among the oral group than the IV group (median, 11 days [IQR, 9-14 days] vs median, 13 days [IQR, 8-16 days]; P < .001]. Fluoroquinolones (62.2% [1224 of 1969]), followed by β-lactams (28.3% [558 of 1969]) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (11.5% [227 of 1969]), were the most commonly prescribed oral antibiotics. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 4581 episodes of GN-BSIs, transition to oral antibiotic therapy by day 7 occurred in fewer than half of episodes, principally with fluoroquinolones, although this practice varied significantly between hospitals. There may have been additional opportunities for earlier and more frequent oral antibiotic transitions because most patients demonstrated clinical stability by day 5.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsSepsisAdultAgedCohort StudiesFluoroquinolonesHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsFluoroquinolones

Identifiers

PMID38165674
PMCPMC10762571
OpenAlexW4390498761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.