Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165634›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Prediction of SBRT response in liver cancer by combining original and delta cone-beam CT radiomics: a pilot study.

Pengfei Yang, Jingjing Shan, Xin Ge, Qinxuan Zhou, Mingchao Ding, Tianye Niu, Jichen Du

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Application of delta radiomics based on cone-beam computed tomography in predicting radiotherapy efficacy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Pengfei Yang *Peking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5803-8859
Jingjing Shan *Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xin GeSchool of Science, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Qinxuan ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mingchao DingPeking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.
Tianye NiuPeking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China. niuty@szbl.ac.cn.
Jichen DuPeking University Aerospace School of Clinical Medicine, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China. djc189@tom.com.
Peking University · CNSir Run Run Shaw Hospital · CNAerospace Center Hospital · CNShenzhen Bay Laboratory · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation Z210008Natural Science Foundation of China 81871351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to explore the feasibility of utilizing a combination of original and delta cone-beam CT (CBCT) radiomics for predicting treatment response in liver tumors undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). A total of 49 patients are included in this study, with 36 receiving 5-fraction SBRT, 3 receiving 4-fraction SBRT, and 10 receiving 3-fraction SBRT. The CBCT and planning CT images from liver cancer patients who underwent SBRT are collected to extract overall 547 radiomics features. The CBCT features which are reproducible and interchangeable with pCT are selected for modeling analysis. The delta features between fractions are calculated to depict tumor change. The patients with 4-fraction SBRT are only used for screening robust features. In patients receiving 5-fraction SBRT, the predictive ability of both original and delta CBCT features for two-level treatment response (local efficacy vs. local non-efficacy; complete response (CR) vs. partial response (PR)) is assessed by utilizing multivariable logistic regression with leave-one-out cross-validation. Additionally, univariate analysis is conducted to validate the capability of CBCT features in identifying local efficacy in patients receiving 3-fraction SBRT. In patients receiving 5-fraction SBRT, the combined models incorporating original and delta CBCT radiomics features demonstrate higher area under the curve (AUC) values compared to models using either original or delta features alone for both classification tasks. The AUC values for predicting local efficacy vs. local non-efficacy are 0.58 for original features, 0.82 for delta features, and 0.90 for combined features. For distinguishing PR from CR, the respective AUC values for original, delta and combined features are 0.79, 0.80, and 0.89. In patients receiving 3-fraction SBRT, eight valuable CBCT radiomics features are identified for predicting local efficacy. The combination of original and delta radiomics derived from fractionated CBCT images in liver cancer patients undergoing SBRT shows promise in providing comprehensive information for predicting treatment response.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansPilot ProjectsRadiomicsCone beam computed tomographyLiver TumorRadiomicsStereotactic body radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID38165634
OpenAlexW4390509494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.