Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165618›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Use of Specific Borrelia Phages as a New Strategy for Improved Diagnostic Tests.

Jinyu Shan, Ying Jia, Tatjana Mijatovic

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PCR Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jinyu ShanDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. js401@le.ac.uk.
Ying JiaDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Tatjana MijatovicR.E.D. Laboratories, Zellik, Belgium.
University of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The high failure rate of tick-borne infection (TBI)-related testing underscores the need for novel approaches that do not rely on serology and two-tier testing. Delayed diagnosis of TBIs, especially Borrelia infections, results in high healthcare costs and great suffering. There is a significant need for a reliable blood test that can aid in the diagnosis of Lyme disease, particularly when the current FDA-approved serological test is not sensitive enough to detect early Lyme patients who have not yet produced antibodies against Borrelia. Bacteriophages are viruses that specifically associate with their bacterial hosts, particularly prophages, bacteriophages residing in bacteria, and have proven to be tightly correlated with their bacterial hosts. They are poised to have wider applications as markers to detect bacteria, particularly in infectious disease. The gene of choice depends on the prevalence of phages within a particular group of bacteria. Phage genes that have been used as molecular markers to examine phage diversity include structural genes encoding the major capsid protein, the portal protein, the DNA polymerase, and the terminase. Borrelia species carry specific phage sequences that can be used as a proxy to identify the bacteria. Using phages as a proxy for bacteria is beneficial, as phages can be detected more easily than bacteria and can be used to bypass the cryptic and tissue-bound feature that typifies human Borrelia infections.We explored a completely new way of detecting Borrelia using Borrelia-specific bacteriophages as a diagnostic tool. Our detection method, patented by Phelix R&D and Leicester University (WO2018083491A1), could potentially transform infectious disease diagnostics through the innovative use of real-time PCR to target circulating bacteriophage DNA in blood from patients with Lyme disease. Firstly, this bacteriophage-based approach offers increased sensitivity since bacteriophages are typically present in five- to tenfold excess over bacterial cells, making it more accurate and sensitive than conventional bacteria-targeting PCR tests. One of the reasons bacteria-based PCR tests are frequently negative is due to the low bacterial concentration in the blood. Bacteriophage-based PCR surpasses this barrier and offers a direct test, as phages are part of bacteria's own genetic material, in contrast to all existing indirect tests (ELISA, Western BLOT, LTT/ELISPOT test). Secondly, a phage-based test can differentiate between different Lyme disease-causing and relapsing fever-causing Borrelia subtypes (B. burgdorferi s. l., B. miyamotoi, etc.), given that bacteriophages are indicators of bacterial identity. Finally, this test can detect Lyme disease in both early and late stages.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesBorreliaBorrelia burgdorferiBorrelia InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesLyme DiseaseDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionBacteriophageBorreliaDiagnosticLyme diseasePCR

Identifiers

PMID38165618
OpenAlexW4390500662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.