ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2024
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Patients with Cerebellar Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of physiotherapy on degenerative cerebellar ataxia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Remote Online-Based Application of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- The CCAS-Scale in Chiari Malformation Type I: A Cerebellar-Focused Cognitive Assessment with Clinical Utility.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) and [18F]-FDG PET findings in spinocerebellar ataxia type SCA27B.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Neurochemical Endpoints to Inform Early-Stage Trials of Spinocerebellar Ataxia 2 and 3 in a Multisite Setting.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- An International Survey of Patients with Ataxia: Trends in Patient-Reported Symptoms.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
- The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome scale in early multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Cerebellar clinical syndromes: the triad and rating scales.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- The Medication Patterns of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 Mutation Carriers Enrolled in the ESMI Cohort.CNS drugs · 2026Article
- Expanding the Early Childhood Manifestations ofNeurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Two-year decline in performance on the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale in spinocerebellar ataxias.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Cognitive Changes in Pre-ataxic Spinocerebellar Ataxias: A Scoping Review.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Prevalence, Severity, and Progression of Cerebellar Cognitive-Affective Syndrome in Patients With Spinocerebellar Ataxias.Neurology · 2025Article
- The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale: Updates and Insights.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 27B can be Suspected Based on Clinical Phenotype: The Massachusetts General Hospital Ataxia Center Experience.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- False Beliefs, True Deficits: Investigating Social Cognition in Friedreich Ataxia.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Cognitive Potential Characteristics and Brain Network Dynamics in Patients with Acute Cerebellar Ischemic Stroke: Insights from P300 and Moving Dipoles.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Article
- Optimizing selectivity of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale by use of correction formulas, and validation of its German version.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 20 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The Cerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome (CCAS) manifests as impaired executive control, linguistic processing, visual spatial function, and affect regulation. The CCAS has been described in the spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), but its prevalence is unknown. We analyzed results of the CCAS/Schmahmann Scale (CCAS-S), developed to detect and quantify CCAS, in two natural history studies of 309 individuals Symptomatic for SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, or SCA8, 26 individuals Pre-symptomatic for SCA1 or SCA3, and 37 Controls. We compared total raw scores, domain scores, and total fail scores between Symptomatic, Pre-symptomatic, and Control cohorts, and between SCA types. We calculated scale sensitivity and selectivity based on CCAS category designation among Symptomatic individuals and Controls, and correlated CCAS-S performance against age and education, and in Symptomatic patients, against genetic repeat length, onset age, disease duration, motor ataxia, depression, and fatigue. Definite CCAS was identified in 46% of the Symptomatic group. False positive rate among Controls was 5.4%. Symptomatic individuals had poorer global CCAS-S performance than Controls, accounting for age and education. The domains of semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, and category switching that tap executive function and linguistic processing consistently separated Symptomatic individuals from Controls. CCAS-S scores correlated most closely with motor ataxia. Controls were similar to Pre-symptomatic individuals whose nearness to symptom onset was unknown. The use of the CCAS-S identifies a high CCAS prevalence in a large cohort of SCA patients, underscoring the utility of the scale and the notion that the CCAS is the third cornerstone of clinical ataxiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.