Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165522›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2024

Automated pelvic MRI measurements associated with urinary incontinence for prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Ingeborg van den Berg, Robert N Spaans, Frank J Wessels, Erik J R J van der Hoeven, Charlotte J Tutein Nolthenius, Roderick C N van den Bergh, Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp, Cornelis A T van den Berg, Harm H E van Melick

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingeborg van den BergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. I.vandenBerg-8@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-1033-711X
Robert N SpaansDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frank J WesselsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Erik J R J van der HoevenDepartment of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Charlotte J Tutein NoltheniusDepartment of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roderick C N van den BerghDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis A T van den BergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Harm H E van MelickDepartment of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPelvic morphological parameters on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as the membranous urethral length (MUL), can predict urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy but are prone to interobserver disagreement. Our objective was to improve interobserver agreement among radiologists in measuring pelvic parameters using deep learning (DL)-based segmentation of pelvic structures on MRI scans.

methodsPreoperative MRI was collected from 167 prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy within our regional multicentric cohort. Two DL networks (nnU-Net) were trained on coronal and sagittal scans and evaluated on a test cohort using an 80/20% train-test split. Pelvic parameters were manually measured by three abdominal radiologists on raw MRI images and with the use of DL-generated segmentations. Automated measurements were also performed for the pelvic parameters. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman plot.

resultsThe DL models achieved median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values of 0.85-0.97 for coronal structures and 0.87-0.98 for sagittal structures. When radiologists used DL-generated segmentations of pelvic structures, the interobserver agreement for sagittal MUL improved from 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.28-0.83) to 0.91 (95% CI 0.84-0.95). Furthermore, there was an increase in ICC values for the obturator internus muscle from 0.74 (95% CI 0.42-0.87) to 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-0.92) and for the levator ani muscle from 0.40 (95% CI 0.05-0.66) to 0.61 (95% CI 0.31-0.78).

conclusionsDL-based automated segmentation of pelvic structures improved interobserver agreement in measuring pelvic parameters on preoperative MRI scans. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The implementation of deep learning segmentations allows for more consistent measurements of pelvic parameters by radiologists. Standardized measurements are crucial for incorporating these parameters into urinary continence prediction models. KEY POINTS: • DL-generated segmentations improve interobserver agreement for pelvic measurements among radiologists. • Membranous urethral length measurement improved from substantial to almost perfect agreement. • Artificial intelligence enhances objective pelvic parameter assessment for continence prediction models.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsUrinary IncontinenceArtificial IntelligenceHumansMaleProstatectomyArtificial intelligenceDeep learningMembranous urethral lengthProstate cancerUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID38165522
PMCPMC10761662
OpenAlexW4390507749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.