Trial reportLasers in medical science2024
Evaluation and comparison of Q-switched Nd: YAG laser 1064 nm and Er: YAG laser 2940 nm in the treatment of macular amyloidosis.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macular amyloidosis (MA) is one of the most common types of primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis (PLCA), distributed predominantly over the trunk and extremities. Due to the vast therapeutic options, this study aims to compare the effectiveness of Q-switched Nd: YAG laser 1064 nm and Er: YAG laser 2940 nm in treating MA. This clinical trial was performed in 2020-2021 on 33 women with MA. In each patient, the lesion was randomly divided into two areas, A and B. Area A underwent four treatment sessions with 4-week intervals of Q-switched Nd: YAG laser 1064 nm. Area B underwent four treatment sessions with an Er: YAG laser 2940 nm at 4-week intervals. Degree of basal pigmentation and degree of pigmentation after treatment, pruritus intensity, before and after the treatment, and patient and physicians' satisfaction were measured and compared. The pruritus in patients improved significantly after the study (P < 0.001), but no significant differences could be observed between the two groups regarding the improvements (P > 0.05). We also found no significant differences between the two groups of patients regarding patient and physicians' satisfaction rates (P > 0.05). The use of both Q-switched Nd: YAG laser and Er: YAG laser resulted in improvements in terms of pruritus, patient and physicians' satisfaction, and total improvement in pigmentation of the lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.