Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165495›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2024

Systematic Review of Machine Learning Applied to the Secondary Prevention of Ischemic Stroke.

Meng Chen, Dongbao Qian, Yixuan Wang, Junyan An, Ke Meng, Shuai Xu, Sheng Liu, Meiyan Sun, Miao Li, Chunying Pang

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng ChenSchool of Life Science and Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Jilin Province, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China.
Dongbao QianSchool of Life Science and Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Jilin Province, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China.
Yixuan WangUnion Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Province, Neurosurgery, Changchun, 130033, People's Republic of China.
Junyan AnUnion Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Province, Neurosurgery, Changchun, 130033, People's Republic of China.
Ke MengUnion Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Province, Neurosurgery, Changchun, 130033, People's Republic of China.
Shuai XuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Jilin Province, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China.
Sheng LiuSchool of Life Science and Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Jilin Province, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China.
Meiyan SunUnion Hospital of Jilin University, Jilin Province, Neurosurgery, Changchun, 130033, People's Republic of China.
Miao LiSchool of Life Science and Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Jilin Province, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China. limiao@jlu.edu.cn.
Chunying PangSchool of Life Science and Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Jilin Province, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China. 1281957328@qq.com.
Changchun University of Science and Technology · CNPeople 's Hospital of Jilin Province · CN

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province 20230101263JCScience and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province 20210401160YYScience and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province 20220204010YYSpecial Project of Health Talents of Jilin Province 2022SCZ19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is a serious disease posing significant threats to human health and life, with the highest absolute and relative risks of a poor prognosis following the first occurrence, and more than 90% of strokes are attributable to modifiable risk factors. Currently, machine learning (ML) is widely used for the prediction of ischemic stroke outcomes. By identifying risk factors, predicting the risk of poor prognosis and thus developing personalized treatment plans, it effectively reduces the probability of poor prognosis, leading to more effective secondary prevention. This review includes 41 studies since 2018 that used ML algorithms to build prognostic prediction models for ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We analyzed in detail the risk factors used in these studies, the sources and processing methods of the required data, the model building and validation, and their application in different prediction time windows. The results indicate that among the included studies, the top five risk factors in terms of frequency were cardiovascular diseases, age, sex, national institutes of health stroke scale (NIHSS) score, and diabetes. Furthermore, 64% of the studies used single-center data, 65% of studies using imbalanced data did not perform data balancing, 88% of the studies did not utilize external validation datasets for model validation, and 72% of the studies did not provide explanations for their models. Addressing these issues is crucial for enhancing the credibility and effectiveness of the research, consequently improving the development and implementation of secondary prevention measures.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeHumansMachine LearningRisk FactorsSecondary PreventionUnited StatesIschemic strokeMachine learningPredictive modelsRisk factorsSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID38165495
OpenAlexW4390508273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.