Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165492›Full record

SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2024

[Short paths to diagnosis with artificial intelligence: systematic literature review on diagnostic decision support systems].

Julia Sellin, Jean Tori Pantel, Natalie Börsch, Rupert Conrad, Martin Mücke

Abstract readEnglish AbstractSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julia SellinInstitut für Digitale Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland. jsellin@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5354-2872
Jean Tori PantelInstitut für Digitale Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Natalie BörschInstitut für Digitale Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.
Rupert ConradKlinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
Martin MückeInstitut für Digitale Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRare diseases are often recognized late. Their diagnosis is particularly challenging due to the diversity, complexity and heterogeneity of clinical symptoms. Computer-aided diagnostic aids, often referred to as diagnostic decision support systems (DDSS), are promising tools for shortening the time to diagnosis. Despite initial positive evaluations, DDSS are not yet widely used, partly due to a lack of integration with existing clinical or practice information systems.

objectiveThis article provides an insight into currently existing diagnostic support systems that function without access to electronic patient records and only require information that is easily obtainable. MATERIALS AND

methodsA systematic literature search identified eight articles on DDSS that can assist in the diagnosis of rare diseases with no need for access to electronic patient records or other information systems in practices and hospitals. The main advantages and disadvantages of the identified rare disease diagnostic support systems were extracted and summarized.

resultsSymptom checkers and DDSS based on portrait photos and pain drawings already exist. The degree of maturity of these applications varies.

conclusionDDSS currently still face a number of challenges, such as concerns about data protection and accuracy, and acceptance and awareness continue to be rather low. On the other hand, there is great potential for faster diagnosis, especially for rare diseases, which are easily overlooked due to their large number and the low awareness of them. The use of DDSS should therefore be carefully considered by doctors on a case-by-case basis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDecision Support Systems, ClinicalRare DiseasesHumansAutomated image analysisData protectionDiagnostic decision support systems/accuracyRare diseasesSymptom checkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.