Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165435›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2024

Evaluation of subarcuate canal on CT images in the perspective of clinical basis.

Davut Akduman, Hilal Melis Altıntaş, Berin Tuğtağ Demir, Ali Köksal, Fatih Çankal, Dilara Patat, Burak Bilecenoğlu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Davut AkdumanAnkara Atatürk Sanatoryum Training and Research Hospital, Gulhane Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Science Turkey, Ankara, Turkey. dr.akduman@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1807-1478
Hilal Melis AltıntaşFaculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0801-0233
Berin Tuğtağ DemirFaculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8301-9257
Ali KöksalDepartment of Radiology, Bayındır Hospital Söğütözü, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4539-8636
Fatih ÇankalDepartment of Radiology, Pursaklar State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-353X
Dilara PatatFaculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-4846
Burak BilecenoğluFaculty of Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-1572

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of our study to contribute to the field of morphometrics by including measurements of the SAC and SAF and their distances from surrounding structures, particularly for surgeons involved in retrosigmoid approach for internal acoustic meatus tumor surgery and cerebellopontine angle surgery. Although there is limited information in the literature regarding the role of the subarcuate fossa (SAF) and subarcuate canal (SAC), it has been suggested that the SAC may be a potential pathway for infection from the middle ear to the posterior cranial fossa, and cerebellar abscesses may have this origin.

methodsFor the images of our study, computerized tomography images of 118 individuals (59 females and 59 males) between the ages of 18-65 who applied to Bayındır Health Group.

resultsThe width of the cranial opening of the subarcuate canal was determined as 44 ± 0.54 mm, width of the labyrinth opening of the subarcuate canal was determined as 60 ± 0.42 mm, Length of the subarcuate canal was determined as 8.79 ± 2.31 mm, width of the subarcuate canal was determined as 5.54 ± 1.75 mm, and depth of subarcuate fossa was determined as 1.67 ± 0.69 mm. The distance of the cranial opening of the subarcuate canal to the superior semicircular canal (SSC-SAC/C) was measured as 5.33 ± 1.81 mm, The distance of the labyrinth opening of the subarcuate canal to the superior semicircular canal (SSC-SAC/L) was measured as 3.90 ± .98 mm, length of the petrous part of the temporal bone medial to the anterior semicircular canal measured from the apex to the SSCD (PLM) was measured as 33.56 ± 0.42 mm. No statistically significant differences were found between the right and left sides.

conclusionsThe morphometric measurements obtained in this study can provide useful information for neurosurgeons, neurotologist and otolaryngologists involved in retrosigmoid approach for internal acoustic meatus tumor surgery and cerebellopontine angle surgery, and for patients undergoing cochlear implant planning with a retrofacial approach.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAdolescentAdultAgedEar, InnerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSemicircular CanalsYoung AdultComputed tomographyInternal acoustic meatusSubarcuate canalSubarcuate fossa

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.