ReviewNeurology2024
FDA Patient-Focused Drug Development Guidances: Considerations for Trial Readiness in Rare Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies
Review in Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Review of Patient Focused Drug Development Meeting Reports for Conditions Affecting Neurodevelopment.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Preparing Genetic Counselors for Advocacy Partnerships: A Novel Internship Model.Journal of genetic counseling · 2026Article
- Caregiver Meaningful Score Differences and Meaningful Score Regions for the Observer-Reported Communication Ability Measure for Individuals with Angelman Syndrome.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2026Article
- Natural Product-Derived Vesicles in Nanotherapeutics.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026Review
- From patient advocacy to patient-driven research: Building active partnerships beginning at the bench to reach the bedside.FEBS open bio · 2026Article
- Recommendations for the use of clinical outcome assessments in rare disease drug development.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Cognitive and behavioral clinical outcome assessments in children with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: Issues and instruments.Epilepsia · 2026Review
- Content Validation of the Communication Inventory Disability-Observer Reported (CID-OR).Journal of child neurology · 2026Article
- Strategic consensus on the clinical translation of advanced therapies in paediatric rare neurological disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026Article
- Association of the Observer-Reported Communication Ability (ORCA) Measure with Established Communication Measures: Insights From the Angelman Syndrome Natural History Study.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Caregiver-reported quality of life in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy and other severe neurodevelopmental encephalopathies.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Parent/caregiver perspectives of meaningful improvement in functional domains for people with CDKL5 deficiency disorder: a mixed-methods study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Nonseizure symptoms and broader seizure impacts in patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in clinical practice settings: Results from a multinational survey.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Caregiver-reported meaningful change in functional domains for individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy: A convergent mixed-methods design.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2025Article
- Beyond Seizures as an Outcome Measure: A Global Severity Scoring System for CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder.Brain and behavior · 2025Observational
- Article
- Review
- Comparability of Methods for Remotely Assessing Gait Quality.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Gross Motor Function in Individuals With SCN2A-Related Disorders: The Clinical Trial Readiness Study.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE) are rare, often monogenic neurodevelopmental conditions. Most affected individuals have refractory seizures. All have multiple severe impairments which can be as life-limiting as or more limiting than the seizures themselves. Mechanism- and gene-targeted therapies for these individually rare, genetic conditions hold hope for treatment, amelioration of disease expression, and even cure. The near absence of fit-for-purpose (FFP) clinical outcome assessments (COA) to establish the benefits for nonseizure outcomes of these new therapies in clinical trials poses significant challenges to drug development. The Food and Drug Administration Patient-Focused Drug Development guidance series provides direction for how to overcome these challenges and to ensure FFP measures are available for trials. The goal is to have measures that address outcomes of importance to patients and caregivers, reliably and accurately measure the outcome in the spectrum of abilities for the target disease, and are sensitive to meaningful change over time. The guidances identify 3 primary strategies: (1) directly adopting and implementing available outcome measures; (2) creating measures de novo; and (3) a middle path of adapting or modifying existing measures. Emphasized throughout the guidances is the indispensable and extensive role of the patient or caregiver to assuring the goal of having fit measures is achieved. This review specifically considers the difficulties of adopting available COAs in severely impaired patient groups and ways to adapt or modify existing COAs to be FFP as encouraged in the guidances. Adaptations include alternative scoring, use of assessments in out-of-intended age ranges, and modifications for individuals with sensory or motor impairments. Some additional considerations that may facilitate achieving adequate clinical outcome measures, especially for rare diseases, include use of personalized endpoints, merging of existing COAs, and developing a consortium of rare DEE advocates and researchers to ensure fitness of adapted COAs across multiple rare disease groups. The FDA guidances help ensure that clinical trials targeting nonseizure outcomes, especially in severely impaired populations, will have adequately valid and sensitive outcome measures. This in turn will strengthen the ability of trials to provide informative tests of whether treatments provide meaningful therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.