Trial reportNeurology2024
Safety and Efficacy of Nipocalimab in Patients With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Results From the Randomized Phase 2 Vivacity-MG Study
Trial report in Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03772587 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of M281 Administered to Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of M281 Administered to Adults With Generalized Myasthenia Gravis
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Various Monoclonal Antibodies in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Brain and behavior · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in myasthenia gravis: A meta-analysis of different antibody subtypes.Immunologic research · 2026Pooled it
- Myasthenia Gravis With Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies in the Very Old: Treatment Challenges and Diagnostic Pitfalls.European journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in adults with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Initiation response, maximized therapeutic efficacy, and post-treatment effects of biological targeted therapies in myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- Nipocalimab Phase 3 Dose Selection for Severe Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Trial
- Design of a Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study of Nipocalimab or IVIG and Prednisone in Pregnancies at Risk for Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia.American journal of perinatology · 2026Trial
- Health-related quality of life outcomes with nipocalimab versus placebo in generalized myasthenia gravis: an analysis of the Vivacity-MG3 study.Journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of Sustained Disease Control With Nipocalimab Versus Placebo in the Phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- A randomized, open-label study on the effect of nipocalimab on vaccine responses in healthy participants.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Trial
- Impact of Batoclimab Treatment on LDL-C with and Without Coadministration of Atorvastatin: Results from a Phase I Randomized Study in Healthy Participants.Drug safety · 2025Trial
- Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Intravenous Efgartigimod and Subcutaneous Efgartigimod PH20 in Healthy Chinese Participants.Drugs in R&D · 2024Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nipocalimab, a Neonatal Fc Receptor Blocker, in Healthy Japanese Volunteers.Clinical drug investigation · 2024Trial
- Trial
- Effect of nipocalimab on IgG responses to vaccinations and viral infections in patients with IgG autoantibody-mediated diseases: Post hoc analyses of three randomized, placebo-controlled trials.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Observational
- Eculizumab in Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter Retrospective Real-World Study in China.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Myasthenia Gravis (MG) Resource Utilization, Epidemiology, Survival, and Treatment Patterns (MG-REST): Estimating the Clinical and Economic Burden in Ontario, Canada.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Conference proceedings from the Western Canadian Neuromuscular Conference (WCNMC) - September 27-29, 2024, Calgary, Canada.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Nipocalimab in Adults With Generalised Myasthenia Gravis: An Asian Subgroup Analysis of the Vivacity-MG3 Study.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesTo evaluate in a phase 2 study the safety and efficacy of IV nipocalimab, a fully human, antineonatal Fc receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).
methodsPatients with gMG with inadequate response to stable standard-of-care (SOC) therapy were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive either IV placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) or one of 4 IV nipocalimab treatments: 5 mg/kg once every 4 weeks (Q4W), 30 mg/kg Q4W, 60 mg/kg Q2W each for 8 weeks, or a 60 mg/kg single dose, in addition to their background SOC therapy. Infusions (placebo or nipocalimab) were Q2W in all groups to maintain blinding. The primary safety endpoint was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including serious adverse events and adverse events of special interest. The primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to day 57 in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total scores. Dose response of change at day 57 was analyzed with a linear trend test over the placebo, nipocalimab 5 mg/kg Q4W, nipocalimab 30 mg/kg Q4W, and nipocalimab 60 mg/kg Q2W groups.
resultsSixty-eight patients (nipocalimab: n = 54; placebo, n = 14) were randomized; 64 patients (94.1%) were positive for antiacetylcholine receptor autoantibodies, and 4 patients (6%) were positive for antimuscle-specific tyrosine kinase autoantibodies. Fifty-seven patients (83.8%) completed treatment through day 57. The combined nipocalimab group compared with the placebo group demonstrated similar incidences of TEAEs (83.3% vs 78.6%, respectively) and infections (33.3% vs 21.4%, respectively). No deaths or discontinuations due to TEAEs and no TEAEs of special interest (grade ≥3 infection or hypoalbuminemia) were observed with nipocalimab treatment. A statistically significant dose response was observed for change from baseline in MG-ADL at day 57 ( DISCUSSION: Nipocalimab was generally safe, well-tolerated, and showed evidence of dose-dependent reduction in MG-ADL scores at day 57 in this phase 2 study. These results support further evaluation of nipocalimab for the treatment of gMG. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03772587; first submitted December 10, 2018; EudraCT Number: 2018-002247-28; first submitted November 30, 2018; date of first patient dosed April 10, 2019. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with gMG, nipocalimab was well-tolerated, and it did not significantly improve MG-ADL at any individual dose but demonstrated a significant dose response for improved MG-ADL across doses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.