ArticleNeurology2024
Rituximab for Multiple Sclerosis: Hiding in Plain Sight
Article in Neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Safety Profiles of Ocrelizumab and Rituximab in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Using Real-World Evidence.Annals of neurology · 2026Article
- Could rituximab revolutionize multiple sclerosis treatment in Brazil? The missed opportunity for fewer relapses and lower costs.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Review
- Racial Inequities, Multiple Sclerosis, and Implementation of a Novel Treatment Algorithm at the Health System Level.Neurology · 2025Article
- Real-world observational study of infections in people treated with ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2025Observational
- Evaluating Rituximab Failure Rates in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: A Nationwide Real-World Study From South Korea.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Family planning and multiple sclerosis - Part 1: Patient perspectives on treatment choices in Sweden.Multiple sclerosis journal - experimental, translational and clinicalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In February 2023, following extensive discussions with stakeholders and data review, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review issued final policy recommendations for treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.