Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38165189›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2023

Quality Improvement Curriculum for Intensive Care Unit Upgrades.

Seth R Bohman, Lauren Day, Colin Danko, Bhaskar Thakur, Raashee Kedia, Samuel Parnell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Seth R BohmanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas.
Lauren DayUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas.
Colin DankoUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas.
Bhaskar ThakurUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas.
Raashee KediaUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas.
Samuel ParnellUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Dallas, Texas.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients admitted to the hospital ward from the emergency department (ED) occasionally decompensate and require transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). An emergency medicine (EM) curriculum focused on review of these ICU upgrade cases could improve resident knowledge related to patient acuity, critical illness, and appropriate disposition. Furthermore, initial identification of critical pathology in the ED and earlier admission to the ICU could reduce delays in care and improve patient outcomes. We performed a retrospective analysis to determine the effectiveness of a resident quality improvement curriculum evaluating cases where patients require transfer from the inpatient floor to the ICU within 12 hours of admission from the ED. We compared postgraduate year 2 (PGY-2) EM residents who participated in the ICU upgrades curriculum during their first year to PGY-2 EM residents who did not participate in the curriculum. Analysis of the 242 qualifying ICU upgrade cases from July 2019-October 2021 showed post-curriculum residents were responsible for an average of 1.0 upgrades per resident compared to an average of 1.54 upgrades per resident (

Indexed as

HypotensionInternship and ResidencyCritical IllnessCurriculumHumansIntensive Care UnitsQuality ImprovementRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38165189
PMCPMC10754193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.