Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164763›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2024

Guidelines for Free-Energy Calculations Involving Charge Changes.

Drazen Petrov, Jan Walther Perthold, Chris Oostenbrink, Bert L de Groot, Vytautas Gapsys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. MgJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Computational Pipeline for Accelerating the Design of Glycomimetics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Automated Adaptive Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Drazen PetrovInstitute for Molecular Modeling and Simulation, Department of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6221-7369
Jan Walther PertholdInstitute for Molecular Modeling and Simulation, Department of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8575-0278
Chris OostenbrinkInstitute for Molecular Modeling and Simulation, Department of Material Sciences and Process Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Vienna 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4232-2556
Bert L de GrootComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3570-3534
Vytautas GapsysComputational Biomolecular Dynamics Group, Department of Theoretical and Computational Biophysics, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Göttingen 37077, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-7780

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Coulomb interactions in molecular simulations are inherently approximated due to the finite size of the molecular box sizes amenable to current-day compute power. Several methods exist for treating long-range electrostatic interactions, yet these approaches are subject to various finite-size-related artifacts. Lattice-sum methods are frequently used to approximate long-range interactions; however, these approaches also suffer from artifacts which become particularly pronounced for free-energy calculations that involve charge changes. The artifacts, however, also affect the sampling when plain simulations are performed, leading to a biased ensemble. Here, we investigate two previously described model systems to determine if artifacts continue to play a role when overall neutral boxes are considered, in the context of both free-energy calculations and sampling. We find that ensuring that no net-charge changes take place, while maintaining a neutral simulation box, may be sufficient provided that the simulation boxes are large enough. Addition of salt to the solution (when appropriate) can further alleviate the remaining artifacts in the sampling or the calculated free-energy differences. We provide practical guidelines to avoid finite-size artifacts.

Identifiers

PMID38164763
PMCPMC10809403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.