Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164618›Full record

ArticleStroke and vascular neurology2024

Treatment practice of vasospasm during endovascular thrombectomy: an international survey.

Jessica Jesser, Thanh Nguyen, Adam A Dmytriw, Hiroshi Yamagami, Zhongrong Miao, Louisa Johanna Sommer, Andrea Stockero, Johannes Alex Rolf Pfaff, Johanna Ospel, Mayank Goyal and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Jessica JesserNeuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1236-8828
Thanh NguyenNeurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2810-1685
Adam A DmytriwSt. Michael's Hospital, Departments of Medical Imaging and Neurosurgery, Neurovascular Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0131-5699
Hiroshi YamagamiStroke Neurology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8133-3314
Zhongrong MiaoDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Louisa Johanna SommerNeuroradiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Andrea StockeroNeuroradiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Johannes Alex Rolf PfaffUniversity Insitute for Neuroradiology at PMU, Uniklinikum Salzburg-Christian-Doppler-Klinik, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0672-5718
Johanna OspelDepartments of Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Mayank GoyalDepartments of Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aman B PatelNeuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vitor Mendes PereiraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Uta HanningUniversitatsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf Klinik und Poliklinik fur Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention, Hamburg, Germany.
Lukas MeyerDiagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Universitatsklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf Klinik und Poliklinik fur Neuroradiologische Diagnostik und Intervention, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-638X
Wim H van ZwamRadiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Martin BendszusNeuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Martin WiesmannNeuroradiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Markus MöhlenbruchNeuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Charlotte Sabine WeylandNeuroradiology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany cweyland@ukaachen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1374-7854
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DEHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Calgary · CABeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNBoston University · USChristian Doppler Klinik · ATMassachusetts General Hospital · USSociety of Interventional Radiology · USSt. Michael's Hospital · CAStroke Association · GBUnity Health TorontoUniversity Medical Center · USUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe clinical importance and management of vasospasm as a complication during endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has not been well studied. We sought to investigate current expert opinions in neurointervention and therapeutic strategies of iatrogenic vasospasm during EVT.

methodsWe conducted an anonymous international online survey (4 April 2023 to 15 May 2023) addressing treatment standards of neurointerventionalists (NIs) practising EVT. Several illustrative cases of patients with vasospasm during EVT were shown. Two study groups were compared according to the NI's opinion regarding the potential influence of vasospasm on patient outcome after EVT using descriptive analysis.

resultsIn total, 534 NI from 56 countries responded, of whom 51.5% had performed >200 EVT. Vasospasm was considered a complication potentially influencing the patient's outcome by 52.6% (group 1) whereas 47.4% did not (group 2). Physicians in group 1 more often added vasodilators to their catheter flushes during EVT routinely (43.7% vs 33.9%, p=0.033) and more often treated severe large-vessel vasospasm with vasodilators (75.3% vs 55.9%; p<0.001), as well as extracranial vasospasm (61.4% vs 36.5%, p<0.001) and intracranial medium-vessel vasospasm (27.1% vs 11.2%, p<0.001), compared with group 2. In case of a large-vessel vasospasm and residual and amenable medium-vessel occlusion during EVT, the study groups showed different treatment strategies. Group 2 continued the EVT immediately more often, without initiating therapy to treat the vasospasm first (9.6% vs 21.1%, p<0.001).

conclusionThere is disagreement among NIs about the clinical relevance of vasospasm during EVT and its management. There was a higher likelihood of use of preventive and active vasodilator treatment in the group that perceived vasospasm as a relevant complication as well as differing interventional strategies for continuing an EVT in the presence of a large-vessel vasospasm.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresHealth Care SurveysPractice Patterns, Physicians'ThrombectomyVasodilator AgentsVasospasm, IntracranialAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsStrokeTreatment OutcomeVasodilator Agentscomplicationstrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID38164618
PMCPMC11732841
OpenAlexW4389947021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.