Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164572›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Recommended Resting-State fMRI Acquisition and Preprocessing Steps for Preoperative Mapping of Language and Motor and Visual Areas in Adult and Pediatric Patients with Brain Tumors and Epilepsy.

V A Kumar, J Lee, H-L Liu, J W Allen, C G Filippi, A I Holodny, K Hsu, R Jain, M P McAndrews, K K Peck and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

V A KumarFrom the The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (V.A.K., J.L., H.-L.L., M.W.), Houston, Texas vakumar@mdanderson.org.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-1233
J LeeFrom the The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (V.A.K., J.L., H.-L.L., M.W.), Houston, Texas.ORCID 0009-0003-1350-4419
H-L LiuFrom the The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (V.A.K., J.L., H.-L.L., M.W.), Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-0284-5889
J W AllenEmory University (J.W.A.), Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-1105
C G FilippiTufts University (C.G.F.), Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-4565-2614
A I HolodnyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (A.I.H., K.K.P.), New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-1159-2705
K HsuNew York University (K.H., R.J.), New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-0990
R JainNew York University (K.H., R.J.), New York, New York.
M P McAndrewsUniversity of Toronto (M.P.M.), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
K K PeckMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (A.I.H., K.K.P.), New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9841-3078
G ShahUniversity of Michigan (G.S.), Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-3173
J S ShimonyWashington University School of Medicine (J.S.S.), St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-6228-776X
S SinghUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (S.S.), Dallas, Texas.
M ZeinehStanford University (M.Z., G.Z.), Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6940-9096
J TanabeUniversity of Colorado (J.T.), Aurora, Colorado.ORCID 0000-0002-7110-8444
B VachhaUniversity of Massachusetts (B.V.), Worcester, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-1422
A VossoughChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania (A.V.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-427X
K WelkerMayo Clinic (K.W.), Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1293-2887
C WhitlowWake Forest University (C.W.), Winston-Salem, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-2392-8293
M WintermarkFrom the The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (V.A.K., J.L., H.-L.L., M.W.), Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-6726-3951
G ZaharchukStanford University (M.Z., G.Z.), Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5781-8848
H I SairJohns Hopkins University (H.I.S.), Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-5077-0471
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNew York University · USPalo Alto University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USEmory University · USJohns Hopkins University · USMayo Clinic · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USTufts University · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Toronto · CAWake Forest University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting-state (rs) fMRI has been shown to be useful for preoperative mapping of functional areas in patients with brain tumors and epilepsy. However, its lack of standardization limits its widespread use and hinders multicenter collaboration. The American Society of Functional Neuroradiology, American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology, and the American Society of Neuroradiology Functional and Diffusion MR Imaging Study Group recommend specific rs-fMRI acquisition approaches and preprocessing steps that will further support rs-fMRI for future clinical use. A task force with expertise in fMRI from multiple institutions provided recommendations on the rs-fMRI steps needed for mapping of language, motor, and visual areas in adult and pediatric patients with brain tumor and epilepsy. These were based on an extensive literature review and expert consensus.Following rs-fMRI acquisition parameters are recommended: minimum 6-minute acquisition time; scan with eyes open with fixation; obtain rs-fMRI before both task-based fMRI and contrast administration; temporal resolution of ≤2 seconds; scanner field strength of 3T or higher. The following rs-fMRI preprocessing steps and parameters are recommended: motion correction (seed-based correlation analysis [SBC], independent component analysis [ICA]); despiking (SBC); volume censoring (SBC, ICA); nuisance regression of CSF and white matter signals (SBC); head motion regression (SBC, ICA); bandpass filtering (SBC, ICA); and spatial smoothing with a kernel size that is twice the effective voxel size (SBC, ICA).The consensus recommendations put forth for rs-fMRI acquisition and preprocessing steps will aid in standardization of practice and guide rs-fMRI program development across institutions. Standardized rs-fMRI protocols and processing pipelines are essential for multicenter trials and to implement rs-fMRI as part of standard clinical practice.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsEpilepsyAdultBrainBrain MappingChildHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID38164572
PMCPMC11285996
OpenAlexW4390329652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.