Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38164535›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

Patient influence on general practice service improvement decision making: a participatory research mixed-methods intervention study.

Jessica Drinkwater, Anne MacFarlane, Maureen Twiddy, David Meads, Ruth H Chadwick, Ailsa Donnelly, Phil Gleeson, Nick Hayward, Michael Kelly, Robina Mir and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coverage and quality of patient participation groups: a mixed-methods analysis of Care Quality Commission reports.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  2. Tackling health inequalities together: inclusion health and co-production.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jessica DrinkwaterCentre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, and honorary research fellow, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1034-0781
Anne MacFarlaneParticipatory Health Research Unit, School of Medicine and Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-5025
Maureen TwiddyHull York Medical School, Institute of Clinical and Applied Health Research, University of Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3794-1598
David MeadsLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1369-2483
Ruth H ChadwickLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ailsa DonnellyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Phil GleesonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nick HaywardLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michael KellyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Robina MirLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Graham PrestwichLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Martin RathfelderLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Robbie FoyLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0605-7713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth policy promotes patient participation in decision making about service organisation. In English general practice this happens through contractually required patient participation groups (PPGs). However, there are problems with the enactment of PPGs that have not been systematically addressed.

aimTo observe how a co-designed theory-informed intervention can increase representational legitimacy and facilitate power sharing to support PPGs to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. DESIGN AND

settingParticipatory action research to implement the intervention in two general practices in the North of England was undertaken. The intervention combined two different participatory practices:

methodTo illustrate decision making in PPGs, qualitative data are presented from participant observation notes and photographed visual data generated through participatory methods. The DCE results are summarised to illustrate how wider population priorities contributed to overall decision making. Observational data were thematically analysed using normalisation process theory with support from a multi-stakeholder co-research group.

resultsIn both general practices, patients influenced decision making during PPG meetings and through the DCE, resulting in bespoke patient-centred action plans for service improvement. Power asymmetries were addressed through participatory methods, clarification of PPG roles in decision making, and addressing representational legitimacy through wider survey consultation.

conclusionCombining participatory practices and facilitated participatory methods enabled patients to influence decision making about general practice service improvement. The policy of mandatory PPGs needs updating to recognise the need to resource participation in a meaningful way.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchDecision MakingGeneral PracticePatient ParticipationQuality ImprovementEnglandFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMalegeneral practiceparticipatory researchpatient participationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38164535
PMCPMC11005925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.